I use Epics to group large bodies of work for a given release (includes stories, tasks, and critical bugs).
The team has started linking all bugs to Epics, which makes it harder/longer to close an Epic.
Do you link Epics to all bugs or just a certain priority?
After a release (ie, Settings page) , do you create a new Epic for that feature/release and group the work there? (ie, Settings page additions/improvements)?
This is really a subject topic. It comes down to whether you feel an Epic (product?) can be considered complete if bug exist. Keep in mind that when SW is involved bugs will always exists so at some point the Epic needs to close. The other question is will an epic consist of multiple releases of SW? In that case, for sure bugs should be part of the Epic. In most cases I would say that bugs should be linked to the stories that are part of the Epic and you could use "blocks" for bugs that block the Story from being consider releasable and "relates to" to those that don't block the release of the feature. You can then use JQL filters to know when a Story is complete. Ultimately, when you are ready to consider marking the Epic done you should consider moving any open linked stories out of the Epic maybe into a subsequent Epic.
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find an event
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.Host an event