The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)

×

Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Multiple issueFunction customfield : Why ?

Vincent Thoulé
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Champions.
September 17, 2013

Related the Groovy Documentation, issueFunction is a customfield that can replace issue in JQL. Also, we use issueFunction in hasComments() instead of issue in hasComments().

Question:

  • Why do we have many occurrence of this customfield ?
  • In <Host>/jira/secure/admin/groovy/ViewScriptedJqlFunctions!default.jspa, we have 22 JQL Functions, but we have currentlt 59 issueFunction customfield. Why / How does it occurred ?
  • When this customfield is created ? On each Scripted JQL Function activation ?
  • Since the 59 customfields poluate the Bulk action, is it possible all of them excepted one ?

Thanks

1 answer

Comments for this post are closed

Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.

0 votes
JamieA
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Champions.
September 17, 2013

Hi Vincent... this is https://jamieechlin.atlassian.net/browse/GRV-322. I would add you as a watcher but I don't think you have logged in.

issueFunction is a custom field which just exists to use a different method of writing jql functions, as returning a list of QueryLiterals is way too slow.

There should only be one. I don't know yet under what conditions more than one is created... but yes likely it will be on plugin activation. It's safe to delete them all except one. Please could you watch the linked issue, I'll provide more updates there. Also could you comment on that ticket with the relevant version numbers.