Data Types in Jira - Built in behaviors Vs non built-in

I am trying to figure out which data types in Jira have built in functionality and which are more “benign”.


  • Issue types:

Although I can add my own issue types, it appears that Jira has unique built-in(?) treatment of many of these. Such as a specific parent-child relationship and not other relationships. Sub-Task is both a behavior and also an Issue Type. Is Feature different from Improvement in its behavior anywhere? Where can I find the specifics around what behaviors really exist in Jira Vs what is offered and is at my disposal?

  • Issue Relationships:

 If I go to add a relationship (as in “blocks”, “blocked by”), its seems that all I am creating is a text that accompanies that link type. No real other functionality. However, at times it seems that in Jira (Or some plug ins) there is some specific treatment of some of these.

These (especially the first) are especially of interest where I am creating a project that supports both Waterfall and Agile development. Waterfall for certain types of Bugs and Agile for pure development.



1 answer

1 accepted

0 votes

The really simple answer -  all of the JIRA fields you get in a plain installation have some functionality above and beyond their simple "data type".  The most simple field is "Environment", which really is just free format text and the only difference between it and a custom free format text field is the position for display on the issue view screen, all the way through to "issue type" which isn't really that complex in itself, but can have a massive impact because huge swathes of configuration can be hung off it.

It's a multi-page essay to deal with all the nuances of all the built-in fields, and far better approach is to explain what you think you need, rather than ramble through swathes of detail you're probably not going to care about. 

To talk about the two things you've mentioned specifically though:

Issue type is mostly irrelevant in plain JIRA.  It IS something that you hang config off, but in itself, all issue types are the same.  Feature, Improvement, Bug, Change, Pengiun, Neutron, doesn't matter, all the same.  

There are two groups of issue types - top-level issue types and sub-task types.  Sub-task types must have a parent issue, and their time-tracking rolls up to their parents, but other than that, they are still just issue types.  

Things get a bit more interesting when you install Agile - that specifically adds functions around Epics and Stories, but doesn't affect any of the others.

On your second question, it's even more simple.  Links join issues.  That's it.  (with a minor nod to "clone" which is only that you create them differently from the other links).  Again, Agile adds a bit of stuff around linking issues to Epics, but not a huge amount.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Join to answer
Community showcase
Sarah Schuster
Posted Jan 29, 2018 in Jira

What are common themes you've seen across successful & failed Jira Software implementations?

Hey everyone! My name is Sarah Schuster, and I'm a Customer Success Manager in Atlassian specializing in Jira Software Cloud. Over the next few weeks I will be posting discussion topics (8 total) to ...

2,950 views 12 18
Join discussion

Atlassian User Groups

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find a group

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find my local user group

Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.

Start an AUG

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs

Groups near you
Atlassian Team Tour

Join us on the Team Tour

We're bringing product updates and pro tips on teamwork to ten cities around the world.

Save your spot