*This is the second article in our series on Form Design. You can find the first article here.
There are two things we know for sure about forms – One: everyone fills out forms, and two: no one likes filling out forms. With that in mind, your goal in designing the layout of your forms should be to help the user get through the form quickly and easily while providing accurate information.
With multiple options for label placement, help text placement, validation, action buttons and page layout – webforms provide multiple ways to pose questions to users. For the purpose of this article however, we’ll be focusing on Jira forms. We won’t get into the weeds about whether or not your labels should be above or to the left of your input fields, because Jira doesn’t offer options on all of those details.
Instead, this second article in our series on form design will focus on three big principles – minimalism, logical structure, and a clear path to completion – that will ensure your forms (be they Jira screens or forms created by a Marketplace app) are as user-friendly as possible. Rather than thinking in terms of what information we need, we will look at the problem from the user’s point of view. Who are your users? What are they trying to achieve by filling out the form?
Let’s get started.
Principle 1: Minimalism
Since no one likes filling out forms, one way we can demonstrate respect for our users is making the forms as brief, easy to understand, and fast to fill out as possible. Less is more when it comes to form. Our brains are subject to cognitive overload. If too much comes at us at once, we’re unable to process it. We don’t have the RAM. So keeping our forms decluttered makes it easier for users to complete them.
Reduce the number of questions you ask
The first thing you can do to make sure your forms are as minimal as possible is to prune back the number of questions you ask. To ensure you’re only asking what you really need to know, either start from a blank slate, or – if you’re working from a template – put every question on trial by considering:
If you don’t need the information, don’t ask for it.
Simplify the language of your questions
You’ll also want to be minimal in how you ask your questions. We’ll be delving into the details of question types and wording in the next article. For now, suffice it to say that your question labels should be concise. Use just as many words as needed to avoid ambiguity. You’ll also want to be sure that the language you use fits your audience. If the form is for customers, use plain language. If it’s for technical users, you can use more technical language.
Keep the extras to a minimum
Keep visual extras (color, images, etc.) to a minimum. Color can be a good option for making important things standout, but only if there’s not too much of it. The same is true for icons. Other than branding, only include images if they help clarify things for the users. Reserve red text for error and validation messages.
Atlassian has been working to reduce cognitive overload when viewing Jira issues...
Jira then: (Image courtesy of Torley)
Jira now:
Make optional questions, optional
You can still pose optional questions. But if it’s not information you have to have to provide the service, then wait and ask it later. In Web Form Design: Filling in the Blanks, Luke Wroblewski cites research indicating that users are more willing to answer optional questions if they’re posed after the initial form has been completed. With ProForma, you can automatically add a supplementary form when the initial form is completed. Alternatively, you can create a customer satisfaction survey in Jira to collect more information (See page 19 of Rachel Wright’s Jira Strategy Admin Workbook for instructions on deploying a minimal customer satisfaction survey in your Jira support project.).
Principle 2: Logical Structure
Now that you’ve decided what needs to be included on your form, you have to decide how to arrange it. Your forms will be a lot more user-friendly if you think of them as one side of a conversation, rather than as a way to get info into your database.
Group questions into sections
A conversation usually starts with easy, non-intrusive questions. Questions in a conversation are grouped around larger topics, and they follow each other in a natural sequence. There are also natural breaks when a conversation shifts to a new topic. You can recreate that in your forms by grouping questions into sections, and by putting those sections – and their respective questions – in a logical order. This will provide context, making it easier for the user to understand what you’re asking for.
Keep introductory text to a minimum
Keep initial instructional text at the beginning of your form to a minimum. If it’s a big block of text users won’t read it anyway. Instead, provide general instructions in their corresponding sections, or better yet, use field-level help tips. Keeping the instructions close to the questions they refer to will eliminate confusion for the user.
There’s one important exception to this rule. It’s good to let people know up front what they will need, and if there are any eligibility criteria. Well designed forms frequently include a “gateway” page or instruction section at the beginning for this purpose.
Use Pages, Tabs or Sections
Online forms often use multiple pages to organize the form into manageable parts. While we don’t have this capacity in Jira, you can organize questions onto different tabs. Similarly, ProForma lets you group questions into sections, and using conditional logic you can progressively reveal more of the form to the user as they work through it. ProForma also lets you include multiple forms on an issue, making it easy to break up data collection into logical parts.
Good form practice also includes a "thank you" or acknowledgment page at the end that lets the user know the form has been successfully submitted, and advises them about the next step in the process.
Principle 3: Clear Path to Completion
Since we know that no one likes to fill out forms, one thing we can do to lessen resistance and procrastination is to make it clear to the user how to get to the end. There are a few strategies you can use to illustrate a clear path to completion:
Consistency
If your team publishes a lot of different forms, use a consistent style when it comes to format, grouping questions, and the overall structure of your forms. This will make the forms feel familiar, and therefore less intimidating to your users.
Be upfront
If the user is going to need information that they’re not likely to have in their head, let them know upfront. Having to leave a task in progress to dig up needed info is frustrating for your users. It also provides a great opportunity for the user to abandon the process all together.
Easy to scan
You can also help users know what to expect by putting section titles in title case. (Section titles are also an item where you may want to use color.) Drawing the eye to section titles makes it easy for users to scan, letting them know what kind of questions to expect.
Vertical alignment
Finally, unless you’re asking for information that demands to be in a grid (e.g. budgets), keep your input fields in a straight vertical line. This makes it easy for the eye to see how to get to the end of the form. The path to completion is like a literal path – if it’s straight you can see where you’re going. If it’s full a switch backs it’s hard to know where you’re going or when you’ll get there.
Compare the path to completion on these 2 forms (Images courtesy of Rosenfeld Media)
_
Creating a clear path to completion, using a logical structure and being as minimal as possible will make your forms more user-friendly and reduce the time needed to complete them. This will improve the quality of the data you receive. Of course, the real nitty-gritty detail of getting good data depends on asking good questions. We'll dive into the details of form questions in the next article.
Jennifer Choban
1 comment