How I can automate "time for update" SLA. Like for example, the SLA set for time for update is every 1h. When the first SLA for the time for update is met or breached, it should automatically display the time for the next update.
Hi @Maeneth
In order to succeed what you want, without the use of an app, you could:
Something along the lines of the following image:
In the above rule you can create an IF/Else component if that suits your need. From my end, I've tried with smart values to mess around the SLA, but I couldn't manage. Perhaps @Bill Sheboy can help further with that.
Hi @Maeneth
I do not have much experience using SLAs with Jira automation, and I just read there are some known problems with triggering when you have lots of SLAs defined (and some time-trigger edge cases) https://support.atlassian.com/cloud-automation/docs/jira-automation-triggers/#SLA-threshold-breached
So a work-around could be a hybrid of what Alex and Stephen suggested:
Remember to add a "stopping condition", where when actions are taken by the team that the custom field is cleared. Perhaps that could be done in a different rule, watching for issue edits by a person/user rather than a rule.
Kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Maeneth
Can I clarify the logic is...
...?
You'd have to have lots of SLAs to make (3) work effectively - should the SLA not refresh itself once an update has been given, rather than start fresh counting down to another hour?
Ste
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for your response.
I need to display that time for the first, 2nd , 3rd update of the SLA "time for updated" which set every 1h if the sevirity is level 1 and every 2h for severity 2 and every 6h for the severity level 3.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Maeneth
I'd say a combination of what Alex and Bill have suggested makes sense:
You could then use the custom field to compare the difference between when the issue was updated, and when it should have been, in reporting.
---
Personally though, I think this is over-complicating things. I'd recommend this approach instead:
^ This approach doesn't "remove" the breach, nor does it require multiple SLAs. It utilises the breach functionality as intended.
---
Let us know which approach is preferred - or if you need more specific help with the Automation Rules!
Ste
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.