You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
Hello,
as I understand it there is a choice that has to be made - estimate Epics or use Version Report. Am I right?
I mean that if I estimate the Epic (sum SP or time from child issues etc.) then this estimate is doubled in Version Report making it unusable. Even when we consider that estimates are also burnt twice faster (once for the issue, once for it part in the Epic) it still makes Version Report unusable because issues without the Epic will burn in regular pace.
Do I really have to make this choice or am I messing something up? How do you guys deal with it? Maybe there is some walkaround?
Actually, there's no choice to be made here. Just use Epics as they are supposed to be used
If you really want to see estimates on Epics, then automate summing up the child issue estimates into another field on the Epic, so the reporting doesn't look at them.
Well, I raised a similar question - If you don't estimate the epics, the Version report shows them as unestimated - How to exclude Epics from Version report ? (atlassian.com)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.