The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)

×

Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

In which JIRA table jql for filter is stored

Deleted user
August 18, 2015

Hi,

In searchrequest table exists the filter name and etc... but where is the sql query stored?

2 answers

Comments for this post are closed

Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.

1 vote
Nic Brough -Adaptavist-
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Champions.
August 18, 2015

It isn't.  JIRA doesn't keep the SQL.  In fact, it doesn't use SQL in searches at all, it reads the Lucene index for them.

The JQL for a search is stored in, well, Searchrequest. 

As a random example from one of my systems, a line from searchrequest says

10109,'Filter for Scrum: Nics project','nic',NULL,'nic',NULL,NULL,'project = "Nic Test" ORDER BY Rank ASC',0,'filter for scrum: nics project'

Note the field in bold!

0 votes
Francisco Morgado Gonzalez
August 14, 2019

Hi, 

The field "REQCONTENT" has the JQL in searchrequest  table 

TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events