The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)

×

Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Creating Child Issues in an Epic in different project types

Tim Alvarado
I'm New Here
I'm New Here
Those new to the Atlassian Community have posted less than three times. Give them a warm welcome!
August 26, 2021

In my org, we have many projects, most of which are "Company Managed" projects & some of which are "Team Managed" projects. 

We have seen that, with Company Managed projects, we can create child issues across projects (For example, EPIC ABC-123 has a child issue DEF-456, and maybe some others). 

We have also seen that on Team managed projects, this doesn't seem to work. For example, team project GHI has an EPIC GHI-789, and I want to DEF-456 to be a child of that EPIC. 

I just want to confirm that this maybe is not working because of the different project types (company managed vs team managed). We can still create links across company managed <> team managed projects, so this threw me for a loop. 

1 answer

1 accepted

Comments for this post are closed

Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.

Post a new question

3 votes
Answer accepted
Jack Brickey
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Champions.
August 26, 2021

That is correct. TMP doesn’t have the concept of Epic link. The relationship between stories and epics in TMP is very different than that of CMP.

Tim Alvarado
I'm New Here
I'm New Here
Those new to the Atlassian Community have posted less than three times. Give them a warm welcome!
August 26, 2021

Thanks, @Jack Brickey ! The theory made sense to me based on the behavior. Thanks for confirming!