You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
We have just setup a new Jira Next-Gen Project. The requirements for this project have recorded in a Requirements Traceability Matrix (a fairly large Excel Sheet). How do I import import this RTM into Jira and ultimately, make this my Backlog? We have also bought Confluence.
In order for your import to be successful, you need to carefully view the hierarchy of the RTM and make sure to specified the correct issue type in the first column. If there are parents and children involved, then you need to include parent id column in your RTM. The other part would be make sure that all your fields exist in Jira.
Nisha, just to add my thoughts, I've been down this road literally several times, and while I have been able to do pretty much as Tony had suggested, the problem encountered is usually that there are not enough levels of hierarchy available to do an exhaustive trace. I'm struggling with that again now, where I need
Stakeholder->Need (Epic?)->Feature (Issue?)->Requirement (task?)->Code->Test->deploy
I end up sacrificing something inevitably because I can only go three levels of hierarchy deep (its a bug tracking tool after all, and we've just overloaded it to do things like ALM and Requirements management that many people just don't understand deeply enough to see the weaknesses.
So in my model above, I would end up mapping Features to an Epic, Requirements to an Issue (which then naturally ties into linking version control code check-ins), test cases under the Issue, and that's about as close as I can get. If I bastardize the Feature, I can combine the need there, but its challenging from an architecture and refactoring perspective, as the Need of a stakeholder drove a feature; In a forward trace model, we end up getting myopic about the Feature when we might in fact replace the Feature entirely with a different approach when focusing on the need. From a reverse trace model, the Stakeholder for a Feature is probably someone like a Product Manager, but in fact the Need likely came from elsewhere before PM encountered it, and having trace back to the sources of the need allows for deeper digging and qualification of the need. So you *might* be able to get Product Management to manage their own Need trace, perhaps including Need identifiers into the Epic when it is defined, but bottom line, I haven't seen how to do a full trace effectively in JIRA, Tony's approach gets you there but you need to evaluate what compromises you want to make.