You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
Have spent some time trying to figure out this with no success....
Here is the case :
And yes, I have tried the following with no success:
Any idea that can help me solve this?
HI @jmorten
In Atlassian view of agile, only the top level tasks are useful for ranking and planning, so the sub-tasks aren't shown in the backlog.
it depends how you view sub-tasks. If you need to include dependencies in your planning then the other tools like roadmaps might help.
When you place a Task or Story on the board, it will show its sub-tasks.
"Atlassian view of agile" is a correct description. I have no idia on why other community leaders say that Scrum have no place for sub-tasks.
Scrum DO NOT say how you should work with your task and should you or not dismantle a story into several sub-task.
Limiting scrum board to Story only making it useless for companys with big products where you simply can't do a single Story in a regular 2 weeks sprint or if you have to distribute work among team members.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, Scrum does not have anything to say about sub-tasks.
That's why they are not sprint items - they're a part of a story, not sprint items in their own right.
Scrum works fine for large companies (certainly better than waterfall) with large stories - remember a part of Scrum is backlog refinement which that includes breaking up stories into smaller parts so they can be completed by the team in a sprint.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sub-tasks have no use in a Scrum backlog (they appear in Kanban because Kanban sees a sub-task as being something that needs doing, just like a standard-level issue. It does not really do anything with sub-tasks).
So, as a backlog's main function is planning, based on sizing and ranking, there's no point seeing sub-tasks in it; they're irrelevant noise.
However, you can get them shown in a basic sense - if you add the "sub tasks" field to the backlog card layout, their keys will be shown as part of their parent issue.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.