You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
So after my researching on this forum and other places, my conclusion is, that Jira doesn't want us to add a task under a story. Given the generally accepted scrum hierarchy Epic > Component > Story > Task > Sub-task, a Jira user will naturally want to see in his sprint board with a story above its tasks above their sub-tasks. In Jira it's only possible to visualize those elements together
A Story and its Sub-tasks, which looks like this:
Story A
Sub-Task 1
Sub-Task 2
A Task and its Sub-tasks
Task A
Sub-Task 1
Sub-Task 2
Can anyone (from Jira) explain the reasons why doesn't Jira allow the visualization of tasks below a story?
Story A
Task 1
Its demented logic that Jira has 2 types of 3-level structures and does not allow the Epic>Story>Task>Subtask structure, which naturally makes sense. No wonder the software is so difficult to use for even the most basic planning.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I periodically hit this entry when I search to see about this issue.
It is mind-boggling that Jira (still) doesn't support the basic:
Story -> Task -> Sub-Task
But you can go infinitely higher up the other way!!!
Incredibly idiotic that Stories can't have Tasks. How can you even have a subtask without a task??? SMH
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Vinh
in Agile you have Epics that group together (user) Stories and (as far as I'm aware) Tasks in Jira are allowed (with all the other custom issue types) so you can add your own maintenance or non-developing related actions.
There's no plan to introduce more hierarchy than Epic > Story/Bug/Task/Other > Sub-Taks/Other
However, should you want infinite hiearchy, you can try https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/34717/structure-project-management-at-scale
I hope this helps a bit.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thank you @Krisztian Kovacs for the clarification of the common used hierarchy. Totally agreed with you there
But that does not exactly answer my question, which is about why can't you sub-order tasks below a story, which seem natural to a lot of Jira users. (I edited my question with some "text visualization")
One question:
Why do you see Story and Task on the same level in "Epic > Story/Bug/Task/Other > Sub-Taks/Other"
I thought the structure has 4 levels like this: Epics > Stories > Taskes > Sub-Tasks
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
oh no, it has only 3 levels
you could try issue linking, that would show you tasks on a story's issue detail page.
what do you think?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Now I remember why I chose ClickUp at my first startup. Back to ClickUp again then.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.