I have worked as a QE for many years on a number of scrum teams using JIRA. Every time I have been on one of these scrum teams, they have no ability, just on a basic level, in JIRA to track or measure QE work. As a result, I am in grooming meetings where Devs are planning work and QE gets excluded. I feel like the main reason for this is that JIRA provides no easy way to deliniate QE/QA work from dev work.
So, I am wondering why this the case is OR what solutions you may have used to get around this? Perhaps there is a way to solve this currently, but the JIRA administrator just doesn't understand Dev team needs?
Or, is the problem my way of thinking: wanting to wrap testing work together with Dev work on a single Story. Isn't it natural to think this way? My company wants testing to be part of each story, which is why I find myself needing this approach.
Agile tends to suggest that testing should be part of the team capablity and hence estimated as part of a story. An estimate of X story points should include the effort needed to create and test the solution to the story. Because the testing should be part of the story, with test capability in the team, there's no need for a separate QA estimate.
That's the theory. In real life, people often use separate issues for QA, especially when QA is not part of the scrum team. I personally prefer to use a sub-task on the story to remind us to test something, but I often see automations used to create and handle testing tasks (whether sub-task or issues in their own right)
Thanks, but my question is more about estimating effort on a story. There is no mechanism in JIRA, for example, to mark a QA sub-task as having a point value contributing to the overall story point value. I think sub-tasks can have a point value, but, for example, that value wont show up in the "Workload by assignee" preview during planning. See what I mean? (I realize it may be possible to roll-up points to the story manually, but still only on a 1-user basis, as reported by 'workload by assignee' preview).
The use-case here is a Story, having a point value, where 2 or more people work on it during the workflow, where the last of those persons, in this case a QE, is working on the story after it has finished achieving its business value, and therefore the QA testing work is often not given additional point value, to the story, as part of its grooming.
I can't possibly be the first person noticing this problem. Do you see what I mean, that JIRA has no mechanism around this and it forces users of JIRA, to do work arounds like separating QE work into different EPIC-stories or STORY-subtasks.
Introducing Jira Cloud for Excel Here at the product integrations team at Atlassian, we are thrilled to announce the new Jira Cloud for Excel add-in! This add-in lets you export Jira data directly ...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find an event
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.Host an event
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events