When in structure view and clicking on the 'quick transformation' button, there are two quick filter:
How can custom filters be added there? I would like to add some custom JQL / S-JQL filter there for easy access for my Project Manager.
At the moment there is no way to save such filters, but it's coming in the future version. However, there is a workaround - you can use the Perspectives feature, to generate a link, which will open the structure with all the transformations applied:
The screenshot is not updated yet - in the new version you can find the share button on the right side of the main toolbar next to the Export.
I hope this helps.
Great to hear that this is planed. We are currently evaluating Structure for our project and while it is great feature wise, we have some issues usability wise, where it is hard for a non-power user (like someone not able to write JQL queries) to use structure effectivly.. having selectable quick filter buttons would be a great help here.
(another thing we are missing is being able to quickly place issue in our folder structure because using drag&drop on a large structure is pretty cumbersome.. Ideally, there would be some simple folder selection, like the subcompontens plugin uses for component selection (https://marketplace-cdn.atlassian.com/files/images/cc64e3fd-f7de-4a68-ab7a-8d2a215ffad0.png), or at least a possibility to display all available folders in pin mode (in the issue view) to place the issue without scrolling through all the existing other issues)
Matthias, thanks a lot for your feedback. This makes perfect sense.
Regarding the first case - do they need to switch between the filters? If so, then the only solution would be to create several perspectives. If not - there is another option. You can add Structure gadget to the Dashboard and apply and additional filter there.
As for the second case - that is an interesting idea and there are a few different ways to approach it. Could you please provide some more details on the use of such a feature? Do you often need to do some sort of triaging and need to quickly put issues in different folders?
Also, have you checked the grouping functionality, which allows you to automatically group issues by different fields?
Maybe I should explain our case a bit more in detail to make things clearer:
We basically separate our backlog in 2 parts:
An active backlog: these are issues which people are currently actively working on. Like writing concepts, doing estimation/refinement or waiting for sprint assignment.. basically issues targeted for for the next 3-5 sprints..
A passive backlog: These are issues in their first stages.. basically only ideas, rough concepts, client communication etc which are not relevant in the near future, but still important to be worked on..
Since this passive backlog easily grows to a size where it is not manageable by a kanban board, I decided to test structure, to structure all of our epic-story-subtask things into a higher level structure, like frontend->Component A->Subcomponent B, to enable my project manager to drill down and look at issues (basically a "okay, our next big thing will be to improve Subcomponent B, so let me see all issues and ideas which are relevant for subcomponent B).
For this work, the Structure Plugin is perfect, because you can drill down and the perspectives give you a good overview of what is happening there (much better then using components and search)!
So we created our folder hierarchy and I added a synchronizer to add all epics and bugs and stories without an epic link. I also added automation expanders to expand the children of epics and stories.. And while this was hard to figure out at first, it works great now!
Now our use cases would be:
Now, these use cases are easy for someone who knows JQL and S-JQL, but for someone who doesn't, a simple button to click to do this filtering would be perfect. Your perspective workaround is okay for now, but I would need to provide my PM with an external link list, which kind of feels not as polished of an experience as I would like it to be, if you know what I mean (using structure was my proposal and I have to convince my team)..
For my second case, it's quite simple: If I create a new Epic, I want to place this immediately into our existing folder structure. The current workflow to do this would be
As our folder structure is very important to us for keeping an overview, this would be a mandatory step for every epic creation (or bug if it is not part of an epic). Also, the mini structure view in the issue details screen is not really helpful at this point, because scrolling through a larger list of folders and issues is hard enough in the structure view, but next to impossible with the limited screen size in the issue details... The mini structure view in the issue details is great for viewing of the placement of the issue, but not really feasible for any editing purposes.
So what we would need (best case) would a simple button in the issue create screen the user can click, look at the existing folder structure (without any other epics, stories etc.) and simply select one folder. Making this mandatory would be a bonus. This way I can assure that every newly created epic would be properly categorized.
A much easier to implement workaround be to have a check box in pin mode to display all folders anyway. This way, at least the sorting process would be a lot easier because a user could
This would in my opinion greatly increase user experience (at least in the case how we are using structure).
I hope this clarifies our usecases a bit more. Thank you for your great support!
Matthias, thanks a lot for the details! I'll add them to our internal tracker and we'll discuss with the team. As I mentioned both your points are totally valid.
The first one is already at the top of our backlog of new features. We need to finish a few tasks related to the maintenance (backup, restore, etc) and fix a few know issues. Once it's done we can start with new functionality and saved transformations will be one of the first.
As for the second case - it's a bit less obvious what would be the best way to implement it, but your workaround, where everything but the folders is hidden, might work.
A quick question. As you add your epic to a folder - should it be added to the top or the bottom of the list?
Also, if you wish, we can schedule a quick call and discuss your use cases. Maybe we'll be able to come up with more ideas for the structure use and see if it can add more value for your company. Please feel free to email me at email@example.com.
A colleague of mine came up a workaround, which might work for you for the second request.
Click the Search button on the Structure Widget toolbar, switch to S-JQL search and add the following query:
!(issue of !empty)
It's not very intuitive to understand, but this will return all items, which are not issues. Then you can click the Filter icon in the search to hide all issues and drag-and-drop issues from the panel on the right to these folders.
By the way - if you open structure in the right panel, there will be a button next to the view selector, which allows you to hide all issues already present in the panel on the left. Could be useful if you need to make sure all issues of a certain kind have been added.
I hope this helps.
Currently the plan is to start working on Quick Filters next month, but I cannot tell you right now when there will be a release for it. It's one of the most popular feature requests and is at the top of our backlog for the next iteration.
I'll try not to forget to update this request once it's complete.
Hi Geetanjali and everyone!
We've just released 3.4.1, which has the Quick Transformations functionality, so please feel free to give it a try. Here is the page with more details: https://wiki.almworks.com/x/7orrAQ
This release also contains a number of performance improvements, which should be useful for larger structures.
Eugene (ALM Works)
Which kinds of transformations are you referring to?
If you use grouping, but default it'll work on the top level, so it'll try to group the folder, which will give you "not an issue" folder at the top level. If you wish to apply transformations to lower levels, you can specify that in their settings.
Please check our wiki page on how to do that:
Please let me know if this helps.
Thanks for the response. Appreciate it.
I looked thorugh the documentations, and under the folder I am able to add automation rules, but not transformations.
Will appreciate if you can point me to the specific section to understand this.
Also for these setting do we need to be the admin, as I am not the JIRA admin, but the admin for the project.
You are very welcome! The trick is that you can define on which level transformation works. Imagine you have folders on the top level and want to create quick filters, which will group issues inside the folder. To do that, you can add your Group transformation - it will be applied to the top level with folders by default. So to apply it to the issues in the folder, open the transformation options (click the small arrow next to its name) and open Edit menu. There you can set Group on Level and set it to Manual - level 2.
Then transformaiton will be applied to the contents of the folder instead of the folder itself.
I hope this helps. If I misunderstood something, can you please provide a couple of screenshots to illustrate this case? You can submit a request through support.almworks.com and my colleagues will be happy to help. Or you can just send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Atlassian Summit is an excellent opportunity for in-person support, training, and networking.Learn more
Hello! I'm Rayen, a product manager at Atlassian. My team and I are working hard to improve the trial experience for Jira Software Cloud. We are interested in talking to 20 people planning t...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs