We're using Portfolio for JIRA not just to manage "people" resources, but (through virtual users) to schedule certain physical resources that are required for some projects.
This works nicely as long as the thing being scheduled is a Story or Bug.
Stage 1: 2 hours of Skill A (Resource A)
Stage 2: 2 hours of Skill B (Resource B)
Stage 3: 4 hours of both Skill A and B
For stories, this does exactly the right thing: both resources are kept busy and nothing is overbooked: for the third stage of work both resource A and B will be used. This fails if the same scheme is applied to Sub-tasks:
"No single user has the necessary skills..."
That seems like an artificial constraint, in that it doesn't apply to other issue types, only sub-tasks. There's mention in the Portfolio FAQ that the number of users that can be "assigned" a single issue in Portfolio is configurable, but I don't see that setting anywhere; nor is there a mention of that limit being configurable by issue type.
There are no plans to actually assign these users to anything in JIRA-- this is all virtual scheduling for planning purposes. Could that constraint be relaxed somehow?
The reason that this occurs is that the scheduling algorithm works on the principle that a sub-task can only be implemented by a single person. This is why it is not possible to use sub-tasks in this way.
Unfortunately it is not possible to relax this constraint.
I’m a designer on the Jira team. For a long time, I’ve fielded questions from other designers about how they should be using Jira Software with their design team. I’ve also heard feedback from other ...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs