Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root


1 badge earned


Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!


Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.


Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!


Come for the products,
stay for the community

The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.

Atlassian Community about banner
Community Members
Community Events
Community Groups

Object Type Permissions (Jira Asset Management)



According to documentation, we can configure object-type-level permissions but here is what I am experiencing:

If a user has an Object Schema Users role, she can view every object type and object under the given Schema. If user does not have any schema-level role but has a Object Type Users role, she is unable to view the schema, therefore cannot access the object type.

So, what is the purpose of Object Type Users role field in this case? What am I missing?

I want a user to be able to access a particular object type. Would appreciate any suggestions setting this up.

Thank you.

1 answer

0 votes

I found this post as I had exactly the same question.

Playing with it a little since the docs aren't clear, it seems that giving access at the object-type level gives the user/group access to edit the objects in that type, and the types under it in the hierarch (even though if you open a child type you don't see the group listed there, you can edit objects in children types)

so, changing this makes the buttons for edit and comment appear/dissappear for objects in that type

Not what I was hoping would be the case.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer