You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
Problem: I would like to institute a rule for my teams, "One component per issue", and I do not see a setting, in the administrative section of JIRA, to implement this.
Relevance: Many of our reports look into the breakdown of any given project's work by component, having multiple components per issue can, ever so slightly, misrepresent those reports.
Comments: I know I can skirt around this problem by creating a custom field but, when you are in a JIRA project, it is nice to be able to click on the puzzle icon in the sidebar and view issues by component.
If you were on Server, there's a hack you can apply to the field template which converts it to single-select. (It remains a multiple entry field in every respect, but the users can't put more than one option into it)
Cloud does not support that. Go with the custom field option (and maybe use components for something else)
You can limit the components to a list by having the project admins define the components correctly (non admins can't edit the list)
To limit it to one, find the .vm file that defines the field layout on edit and change it so it only allows for one selection, then restart Jira. From memory, it's component-edit.vm somewhere below atlassian-jira/WEB-INF/classes/template/ - a quick search should find it (it definitely has component in the file name). You may also want to edit the file for bulk change too.
I found a workaround for this on Jira Cloud.
I added two validators on one early transition in the workflow :
I duplicated these validators to other key transitions in order not have an issue later on.
For my need, it seems to do the trick.
Hi Guillaume @Guillaume Wolf , I like this workaround. Are those standard Validators or did you have to custom make them? If standard, which validators did you use for preventing more than one value?
UPDATE: Never mind. I was able to do it with SR. Thanks for the suggestion