How to filter structure items on the second level of hierarchy?

Ľuboš Laslop
I'm New Here
I'm New Here
Those new to the Atlassian Community have posted less than three times. Give them a warm welcome!
January 20, 2025

 

I have a structure with the following issue types at each level:
1. Initiative
2. -> Portfolio Epic
3. -> -> Capability
4. -> -> -> Feature
5. -> -> -> -> Story

All issue types are linked by a parent - child relationship. The structure is defined as follows:
Extend: Add sub-tasks
Extend: Add issues linked by Hierarchy: parent is parent of children
Insert issues: project = INIT AND type = Initiative AND (resolution is Empty or resolved >= -365d)

I don't know how to filter out only those Portfolio Epics that are resolved more than a year ago. Can anyone advise me how to do that?

1 answer

0 votes
Stepan Kholodov _Tempo_
Community Leader
Community Leader
Community Leaders are connectors, ambassadors, and mentors. On the online community, they serve as thought leaders, product experts, and moderators.
January 20, 2025

Hello @Ľuboš Laslop 

you can remove Epics by adding a JQL-based Filter generator with a query like this: resolved >= -365d and setting the Filter on level setting to level 2. As a result, all non-matching Epics will be removed, including all of their direct sub-issues in the structure.

Please note - before adding a generator, you need to place the focus in the right place which is the name of the structure right below the Summary column's name.

I hope this helps. If you need further assistance or if you have other questions about Structure, please reach out to us directly at our support portal.

Best regards,
Stepan
Tempo (the Structure app vendor)

Atlass Monster
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Leaders.
January 20, 2025

I don't think the fella was asking for a third party here... 

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer