You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
Hello, for some reason the "Create Modal" has always been problematic in Jira. Poor support for markdown for example.
We have automation in use to populate the Description field (for Bug type) with a template to fill in details and extra instructions.
This works fine except for the create modal. The following 2 screenshots will demonstrate:
Create Modal:
Created via other means:
Here is the automation rule:
Is automation the right path? It would seem so as "Description" should be the same field internally regardless of creation.
AC: Have the template text populate in the Bug description field before anything is entered, period, all the time. Staff will then add/remove as needed for the issue to be actioned.
Help is greatly appreciated.
--M
## The following content is added 3Oct2022 by OP:
Speaking towards @Bill Sheboy comments.
The following is our automation.
My comment: The "on create" rule is the deal breaker as we understand. When the issue is opened via /browse/XX-YY the template is added at that point. We are trying to match previous GitLab use where a template would be prepopulated for bug reporting. This is a common practice and one I have seen done in Jira as well.
Advice welcome.
Regarding Logs: I do not have anything directly to report, could be a product of my ignorance.
Im looking for this exact automation myself.. it seems that the "Issue created" doesn't fire because the modal is only a "draft" state?
Would it make sense to add a "Issue drafted" trigger? Or update the the current "Issue created" to account for drafts as well?
Hi @Sean Sullivan -- Welcome to the Atlassian Community!
The issue created event only fires after the event has happened, and so the rule only happens after that. I do not believe issues have a "draft" condition, and so adding such a trigger would be predicated on other substantial changes for issues.
When you need the template before the issue is created...the two solution approaches I have seen noted by the community are:
Kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @marc
It's Aleksandra from Deviniti, the vendor of the Issue Templates for Jira app.
After reading your post, I can see that the use case you described can be also accomplished with the templates functionality we provide, as an alternative to automation.
In short, the app allows you to create a repository of re-usable templates that may not only copy over various fields' values, such as predefined descriptions for bugs, but also populate more advanced structures of Epics, Stories, Tasks with Sub-tasks, and any additional issue links automatically. The text autocompleted by such a template would be then inserted directly into the description field once a user follows the Create issue from template button.
The app is currently available for all hosting options including Jira Server/DC and Cloud. Feel free to ask here in case of any additional questions about the functionality or the required setup.
I'll be happy to help!
Cheers,
Aleksandra
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @marc -- Welcome to the Atlassian Community!
Would you please show images of your rule and of the audit log details for the various paths? That may provide some context for the community to offer suggestions for your rule. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for that information. A few things I noted that could help...
Putting the first two ideas together, your rule could be something like this...
{{issue.description}}
Here is some template information
Here is more template information
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.