Hello Team,
I have a requirement where I need to block tickets from being added to the active sprint when the Original Estimate field is blank or has a value of 0 hours.
I realize I can make the field mandatory, but we have people from the sales team or support team creating tickets, and it will be difficult for them to provide an estimate.
Any help on a possible solution to the above request would be much appreciated.
Please let me know if you need any further details.
Thank you!
As long as you add tickets to your sprint from a board rather than editing the sprint value on the ticket you can:
Set up a quick filter on the board
e.g. 'Hide un-estimated tickets'
originalEstimate IS NOT EMPTY
When that filter is selected you won't see any un-estimated tickets on the backlog
In case you forget to turn that quick filter on you can also add a card colour query so you can see any un-estimated tickets easily:
🟥 originalEstimate IS EMPTY
I like the quick filter approach, a good intermediate solution between blocking upfront and automatically (or unattended) removing issues. It draws attention to those issues and leaves it up to the user to decide whether to add the estimate or remove the issue from the sprint.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, you can also create a second quick filter to only show un-estimated tickets ('originalEstimate IS EMPTY') which can help show what needs to go through a refinement session
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
HI @srikanth_rao ,
AFAIK there is no easy answer to your question (yet). A corresponding feature request is being tracked here: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSWCLOUD-15376
However, depending on your setup, you might want to give the following workaround a try:
While this is a proactive workaround, a reactive one might incorporate an automation rule that removes issues from an active sprint if no estimation is provided. However, I prefer preventing inconsistent states upfront to the subsequent cleanup by automation rules.
Regards from Germany,
Thorsten
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.