Jira Automation Efficiency

Alexandra Astor May 4, 2023

I have several global automation rules that work as expected.  However, due to the volume of tickets in the project, the automation rules run hundreds of times a day.  Therefore, we are quickly maxing out of number of global automation rules permitted.  Is there a way to re-write these rules to make them run less frequently?

Automation3.PNGAutomation2.PNGAutomation1.PNG

1 answer

1 vote
Nic Brough -Adaptavist-
Community Leader
Community Leader
Community Leaders are connectors, ambassadors, and mentors. On the online community, they serve as thought leaders, product experts, and moderators.
May 4, 2023

There's no way to reduce the number of triggers without changing how your users work.

But you could merge the automation - the "if value of field X changes" doesn't have to be one per field, you can say "if the fields X, Y, or Z change".

Also, the middle rule you have only works in one project.  You could remove the project check from it, and put the rule into the project instead of it being global, so it wouldn't count against your global automations any more (and wouldn't even start for anything other than that project)

Bill Sheboy
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Leaders.
May 4, 2023

Hi @Alexandra Astor 

Adding to Nic's suggestions...

Without seeing the details of your rules' issue edit actions, I wonder if the edits of the two merged rules could be done with one branch and one issue edit action.

  • The branches are different (one is on "clones" and the other is on "clones" or "is cloned by") so perhaps they need to be separate, but if not that would reduce processing time.
  • Another processing improvement could be to use the JQL branch to check for linked issues of a certain type and in QMT in one step, rather than with the linked-issues branch plus a condition on project.
  • With one branch the edits to fields might be done in one edit step, if you do not worry about them showing up in the history as changes when not necessary

Finally to Nic's original point, knowing why the first two rules are needed may reveal other alternatives.  That is, what problem are these trying to solve?  I hypothesize you are doing this to help with reporting and issue alignment on roadmaps across projects.

Kind regards,
Bill

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
DEPLOYMENT TYPE
CLOUD
PRODUCT PLAN
STANDARD
PERMISSIONS LEVEL
Site Admin
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events