You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
We have the Jira Data Center and are in the process of reviewing or current plugins for our annual budget. I am looking for specifics on the differences between Scriptrunner and Jira Suite utilities (JSU). Both have some similar features but is there a comparison chart to show what one does and the other does not?
I don't know about a comparison chart, but ScriptRunner does pretty much anything you can think up, as long as you've got the Groovy chops to pull it off. JSU is more of a.... utility suite. If your org is using ScriptRunner for any kind of custom scripting, JSU won't replace that.
Scriptrunner can do anything JSU can do, because you can write a script for anything that JSU does. It also allows you to write other scripts that can do things that JSU does not support.
Until recently though, it was not "no code" like JSU, you did have to find or write scripts to replace some functions. But a couple of years ago, I noticed our developers had added built-in scripts that don't need code to implement, ones that can replace every function in JSU (and a couple of other apps)
So a summary of the comparison is
JSU | SR |
Can do X | Can do X |
Cannot do Y | Can do Y |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.