Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in
Celebration

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root

Avatar

1 badge earned

Collect

Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!

Challenges
Coins

Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.

Recognition
Ribbon

Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!

Leaderboard

How to find Issues with Merged PR

I'd like to find all open issues that have a merged PR in order to find tickets that might have been forgotten to be resolved and therefore will probably ship to production untested.

JQL has the two terms `development[pullrequests].open` and `development[pullrequests].open`, but unfortunately no means to filter out `declined` PRs. So when I do `status not in (Closed, Resolved) AND development[pullrequests].all > 0 AND development[pullrequests].open = 0`, I will get both issues with `merged` and `declined` PRs. I'd like to only get the ones with `merged` PRs.

Is that possible somehow? If not, could this be added to JQL?

3 answers

2 accepted

7 votes
Answer accepted
Anton Genkin
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
May 13, 2019

Hi @Fabian Ehrentraud 

For Jira Software Server 7.8+ you can find the full list of available development fields here - https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirasoftwareserver/advanced-searching-fields-reference-939938743.html 

To find all the issues only with merged pull requests I recommend using the following filter:

development[pullrequests].merged > 0 AND development[pullrequests].open = 0 AND development[pullrequests].declined = 0

nice that `merged` now exists! but i'd not filter for `declined = 0`, because it could be that 2 PRs were created for a ticket, one declined and one merged, and these tickets should still show up.

Like jwhite likes this

@Anton Genkin How do you do this in Jira Cloud? When I try to use development[pullrequests].merged > 0 I get the following error.

For "development[pullrequests]" use "development[pullrequests].all" or "development[pullrequests].open"

Like # people like this
Anton Genkin
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
May 29, 2019 • edited

@[deleted] The list of fields available in Jira Cloud is different from Jira Server. 

As of May 2019, Jira Cloud doesn't support development[pullrequests].merged field.

Here is full search reference for Jira Cloud - https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirasoftwarecloud/advanced-searching-developer-reference-967312910.html

@Anton Genkin Do you know if the merged field is on the roadmap for Jira Cloud ?

Like # people like this

 

@Anton it would be very nice to have development[pullrequests].declined and .merged in Jira Cloud.  Any ETA?

Like # people like this

WHY all of you is saying that this exists, it DOESN'T

Look:

 

Like Daniel Li likes this

For anyone searching to find merge PRs only: 

development[pullrequests].all > 0 AND development[pullrequests].open = 0

 

it will include the merged and declined tho, there's no other way.

 

 

Like # people like this

@FinAdmin That only works if PRs are never declined.  If there are multiple rounds of PRs that get declined and none ever gets merged, your query will return that result.

Above @Anton Genkin mentioned that Jira Server supports .merged but Jira Cloud does not.  I presume you ran your test on Jira Cloud.

It's been 1.5 years, @Anton Genkin can we get .declined and .merged in Jira Cloud soon?

Like # people like this

And it has been 6 more months. How about we get .merged in Jira Cloud now?😜

Like # people like this

And it has been 3 more months. How about we get .merged in Jira Cloud now?

Like # people like this


development[pullrequests].open > 0

This works, but not merged or declined, still looking to know how to filter for these, in case anyone knows

Like CKinKC likes this

Same, is anyone aware of a feature request for this.  It's very frustrating, thank you!

9 months later. How about we get .merged in Jira Cloud now?

Like # people like this

Jira is a big, fat company.  They have the market share such that their product managers don't have to worry about keeping customers happy.  Thus, if it takes five years to implement something that should take five minutes, it takes five years!  And you'll sit there and like it!

This combo JQL will find all tickets with merged pulls, assuming they also have no open PR's as well (combo merged and open, same issue)

development[pullrequests].all > 0 and development[pullrequests].open = 0

Like # people like this
Ruan Heyns
I'm New Here
I'm New Here
Those new to the Atlassian Community have posted less than three times. Give them a warm welcome!
Sep 19, 2023

I think @Anton Genkin might have left this god awful company, and still this has not been resolved for Jira Cloud

0 votes
Answer accepted
Caterina Curti
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
Jun 27, 2018

Hi @Fabian Ehrentraud,

It seems like this behaviour matches what is described on the following feature request (this is the Jira Server version):

JQL Entity Property for Pull Request Status

 

If that's the case, feel free to comment on the feature request to share with the Jira team the use cases for this request.

 

Cheers,
Caterina - Atlassian

Thank you, that indeed looks like a feature request for what I try to do. Too bad that it is not possible yet.

Caterina Curti
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
Jun 27, 2018

Thanks Fabian for commenting on the feature request. Really appreciated!

Having status property is a should have feature,
I guess atlassian removed it for a purpose

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events