Degraded performance Customers may experience intermittent errors using Community search. Our platform vendor is investigating.
Hello, I am currently experimenting with the JIRA webhook utility and it is working great. I am interested in a filter which will exclude the updates from one specific user from the webhook notification, for example: I have 3 users: admin, mega and mega2. I want to receive webhook notifications when mega and mega2 make issue changes, but not to receive notifications when admin makes changes.
The filter I am currently trying to utilize is as follows:
project = "Test" AND cf is not EMPTY AND NOT status changed by admin
The problem that I have with it is that, in this configuration I stop receiving notifications from all the users, not only admin user. If change the operator to "AND", so that only admin user notification will be filtered, I start receiving notifications from all users. So it appears as though the filter is not working properly.
However if I try to use "non-existent" user, like this "admin11" like:
project = "Test" AND cf is not EMPTY AND NOT status changed by admin11,
Then I start getting messages from the other users. So at the same time it appears that the filter is either working, or the whole clause is negated.
I am really confused by this behavior. Any clarifications/suggestions will be appreciated.
First, if you're entering a filter just like yours above, I'm really not sure how you'd seemingly be getting the opposite results unless there's a problem with your webhook or something other than the filter. If you like what you see returned from JQL, then I'd also expect those results to be what notifications you get.
I honestly do not think this is the outcome that you truly want, as this is only an answer to your specific scenario example of admin, mega, and mega2
In that example, you already know what other 2 users you do want, say, status changes of mega and mega2 but not admin, so by explicitly naming them, you'll get those results:
project = "Test" AND cf is not EMPTY AND status changed by (mega, mega2)
However, what I think you'd really want of maybe 50+ users and not of one 'admin' user, which in this case, I highly doubt that you want to write a filter with each of those individual user names hardcoded.
....still trying to think of an easier way for that. Also, I'm not a fan of the "status changed by" since maybe you just want all notifications like field edits and not necessarily only a status change.
Hi, thank you for answering. Yes the end goal with the filter will be to have notifications for all issue changes from all users except one specific user. I gave the example with status change because this is what i started with to find if the user filter is working as I expected.
I am still not sure why the NOT <field> changed by <user> is not working
This community is celebrating its one-year anniversary and Atlassian co-founder Mike Cannon-Brookes has all the feels.Read more
As a Jira power user, I was at first doubtful that Trello could benefit my workflow. Jira already uses boards (ones you can customize!), so why would I even need to use Trello?! In this post you will...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs