I am not certain if this is a broken API issue or something wrong we doing in the construct.
Curiously when the body only contains the jql property, then the response returns to expectation and contains required pagination properties.
Once you add any additional param to the request body, we get the same result with no pagination properties
Hi @Attard_ Gavin ,
Welcome to the Atlassian Community.
I attempted to replicate the behavior you mentioned and was unable to do so. You should be able use the filter=xxx syntax provided that filter xxx is valid and accessible to the user running the API. When I tested this out my results were paginated as expected.
The fact that the issues are returning does mean that the request is successfully executing in your query as well.
I am curious on a couple of things:
Best,
Andy
Thanks Andy, ye i tried that. I removed each parameter one by one, to see if any one was the issue, it only worked once i removed all of them and left jql.
What i didn't state here is that i am using Knime for the data pull. I wonder if it is doing something funny to the params which is breaking it, but from what i understand it shouldn't be
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Attard_ Gavin , thanks for the additional information. Interesting it needs to remove all the parameters other than JQL in order to work.
I am not familiar with Knime, I agree that it likely shouldn't have an impact, but as a test could you try using curl or Postman instead? When I tested this I was using Postman. This would just help to rule out any possible issues with Knime.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Attard_ Gavin ,
Welcome to Atlassian community and thank you for your question.
I guess the problem is in the jql parameter, try to replace "filter=22448" with the corresponding jql.
As far as I know, using filter=xxx it isn't a valid jql.
Hope it helps
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The filter isn't the issue, i get the same result if i reference the filter or use the same jql query the filter uses.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.