Planning with Issues but how to get an overview on Project level?

[Deleted user]

We use Tempo Timesheets in the live environment of our JIRA and we are trying out Tempo Planner in our test environment since we expected to fix our obstacle this way...

In our process, we handle a lot of projects or initiatives at any given moment in time.
Therefore a planned Issue does not give us the insight in which project the effort is planned.

Can I adjust this view so that it shows which Project or Initiative this Issue belongs to?

The overview in Teams: Timesheets does have the option to show the Project, Epic and Issue level, so does the Tempo: Reports section.

All in all, my end-goal is to be able to compare hours planned and hours spent on all our different projects. Does our projection match our execution.
I hope this is possible.

A CS representative at Tempo replied to me that this is not a feature available in Tempo.
She advised me to submit a feature request in their 'Ideas' section.

In the meantime, does anyone here have a possible solution available?

[Martin Bayer _MoroSystems_ s_r_o__ · Accepted solution]

When you have Tempo Planner and Tempo Timesheets installed at once. It looks like report you need is available, but I tried it on my testing environment and it does not work. So maybe just hint for you.

If you have only Tempo Planner installed I think it does not work with logged work at all. I remember we had to implement new screen for our customer which mixed data from Tempo (plans) and data from issue worklogs.

I think you could implement something like that by BetterExcel plugin (by Midori - https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1212652/better-excel-exporter-for-jira) but you will have to download it as XLSX file from Jira.

Maybe someone else will have better idea.

[Deleted user]

Thank you!
I will be sure to investigate on your suggestions.

[Deleted user]

So far it seems like I can get most of my requirements out of the Planned vs Actual report. Thanks Martin!

[Martin Bayer _MoroSystems_ s_r_o__]

@[deleted] it was only my idea, but you proved it :) thank you for "testing" :)