I've read many articles and I simply can't figure this out...
On the backlog board view, any issue that isn't "new" has its issue number struck through. I've never seen this before in other instances I've used. It is driving me nuts because I've always used the strike through as a quick way to see what's resolved. If something '"in progress" looks resolved, that's painful.
I found in an article that any resolution - including "Unresolved" - is considered a resolution, so thus strikes through the issue number.
I'm new to the project in question, so don't have optics into the details of why things were done. For instance, when creating an issue, a resolution is required AND there's an option for "Unresolved". I've never seen this before... Why do I want a resolution when I'm creating an issue??? (that was rhetorical)
When an issue is new it does not have a strike through. When it transitions to any other status, the strike through happens.
I suspect I have to adjust the workflow, but I can't find where/how. I also suspect I have to do something about a resolution being required and that "Unresolved" shouldn't be a dropdown option.
Any thoughts? Many thanks!
You need your admins to fix the mistakes they've made, to prevent more data becoming wrong, then you can fix the existing damaged data as a second exercise.
To prevent more damage
That now means your data won't get more broken. To patch up the broken stuff, where things have a resolution but are not really resolved, you have some options
Thanks for the help @Nic Brough -Adaptavist-. I'm not out of the woods quite yet, but I'm narrowing things down.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I'm new to the project in question, so don't have optics into the details of why things were done. For instance, when creating an issue, a resolution is required AND there's an option for "Unresolved". I've never seen this before... Why do I want a resolution when I'm creating an issue??? (that was rhetorical)
Yes, that is indeed the problem. It looks like your workflow and screen schemes are set to have resolution populated at various stages. You need to work with your admin to remove resolution from the create screen and from the post functions of workflows.
A resolution named "Unresolved" is not needed. Jira shows it as Unresolved when there is no resolution on it.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks, Jobin. At least I know I'm on the right track.
My problem: The old admin is gone and I'm the new one...so I have no one to ask... Between workflows, screens, schemas, etc., I'm going in circles. I can't find the specific config options to make things right.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Nic Brough -Adaptavist-has already mentioned some of the things you can do :) I would start with removing resolution from the screens and adding it only on the post function of the final step of the workflow (or wherever it makes sense).
Also see the following links and their related content.
https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirakb/resolutions-are-not-set-225122076.html
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.