Want to integreate Jira with NTLM. It was working for 3.12.3. After i migrated to 4.4.1, it is not working.
Any idea on this ..
To be correct "supporting ... protocol" has never been in Atlassian interest in the context of NTLM authentication to Jira or Confluence or any other product besides Sharepoint Connector (where it is very much in their interest and that's exactly what they do there) - the support for all other applications was via a 3rd party plugin, which was NEVER supported by Atlassian.
My personal opinion is that there is a lot of FUD around Kerberos vs. NTLM on the net.
I've already quoted the developer of Jespa (surely both us and them do have a vested interest in NTLM) on this forum once about the "future of NTLM", here it is below again.
"Q: I am also a bit worried about NTLM being deprecated in favor of Kerberos - what's your take on that?
A: Kerberos does not work if they client does not have access to the DC (and under a variety of other conditions) so NTLM will never be deprecated in favor of Kerberos. At least not Kerberos in it's current form. I suspect Microsoft will eventually add some extension of Kerberos that does not have these restrictions. But if they don't have that on the drawing board yet it will be many years before they can shelve NTLM.
Note that NTLM is actually better than Kerberos in many ways. Kerberos is very fickle. Kerberos clients must have direct access to DCs, DNS has to be exactly right for clients and servers, time has to be synchronized to within usually 5 minutes on the client, server and DC, if new Kerberos keys are distributed tickets can become stale and need to be purged. IOPLEX's first product was actually a Kerberos module for PHP. When I did Jespa I conscientiously decided to do NTLM instead because Kerberos is so fickle. I think that is one of the reasons why Jespa is so popular. It's easy to setup and once it is, it just works."
Here's a nice write up on NTLM -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa378749%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Supporting a lesser secure protocol than what else is now available (Kerberos) is not in Atlassian's best interest - as just an opinion.
Maybe you should consider a new path?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
To be correct "supporting ... protocol" has never been in Atlassian interest in the context of NTLM authentication to Jira or Confluence or any other product besides Sharepoint Connector (where it is very much in their interest and that's exactly what they do there) - the support for all other applications was via a 3rd party plugin, which was NEVER supported by Atlassian.
My personal opinion is that there is a lot of FUD around Kerberos vs. NTLM on the net.
I've already quoted the developer of Jespa (surely both us and them do have a vested interest in NTLM) on this forum once about the "future of NTLM", here it is below again.
"Q: I am also a bit worried about NTLM being deprecated in favor of Kerberos - what's your take on that?
A: Kerberos does not work if they client does not have access to the DC (and under a variety of other conditions) so NTLM will never be deprecated in favor of Kerberos. At least not Kerberos in it's current form. I suspect Microsoft will eventually add some extension of Kerberos that does not have these restrictions. But if they don't have that on the drawing board yet it will be many years before they can shelve NTLM.
Note that NTLM is actually better than Kerberos in many ways. Kerberos is very fickle. Kerberos clients must have direct access to DCs, DNS has to be exactly right for clients and servers, time has to be synchronized to within usually 5 minutes on the client, server and DC, if new Kerberos keys are distributed tickets can become stale and need to be purged. IOPLEX's first product was actually a Kerberos module for PHP. When I did Jespa I conscientiously decided to do NTLM instead because Kerberos is so fickle. I think that is one of the reasons why Jespa is so popular. It's easy to setup and once it is, it just works."
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.