Hello,
I am trying to setup the development of a hardware product on JIRA. The parent product is a box which has boards and a sensor (which is a child project). We want to use JIRA to track bugs so whenever an issue/bug is raised the relevant team is notified. For the boards I have added them into the components within the parent project and assigned a leader who looks after any issues on them. But for the sensor which is a different project (child) in itself I cant find a suitable way to track issues. Essentially for the sensors what I would like to do is to raise an issue in the sensor project (child) using the board of the parent project (box).
The template I have used is Scrum and company managed project for the parent project.
Could you please suggest me how to do this/or if there is a better way of doing this.
If I understand you correctly, you want to create an issue in the Sensor project based of a ticket that was originally created in the 'Box' project? Does it always start there? Would it be a manual action from someone to create that ticket for the Sensor project?
My first thought would be to create an Manual Triggered Automation Rule that would be able to handle this. But, keep in mind that Automation executions for the Free version are very limited- So if this is what you need, you might have to consider paying for the Standard version which includes more Automation Rule executions.
Once you've shared some more details, I would be able to help with a more fitting solution. :)
Hello Hans,
Thanks for your prompt response.
Yes you are right! I want to create an issue in the Sensor project based of a ticket that was originally created in the 'Box' project.
Yes the issue will always start from the box project and it would be a manual action.
Cant we try to have the sensor as a component in the box project and when we raise a ticket it shows on the sensor project?
Thanks in advance.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hey Aliaqbar,
Thanks for the additional information. It doesn't work like you describe. If a ticket is created in project BOX with component Sensor, it will get the issue key of the BOX project (BOX-123), and will therefore not show up in the SENSOR project. You can adjust the filters of a board to only show the BOX project issues with SENSOR components, but that's likely what you've been doing with the other BOX components.
Can you share a bit more about why you would want to have a separate project for the Sensor, but keep all the other components in the BOX project? I understand the physical 'parent/child' relationship, but I'm wondering what value it adds for you to have it in a separate project.
Regardless of above, you would still need an Automation Rule to create this 'follow-up' ticket for the Sensor team. In that automation rule, you can copy all kinds of values from the trigger ticket and do a whole bunch of cool stuff that could eliminate manual actions/chances of errors. This Automation Rule would just as well be able to create a follow-up ticket within the BOX project or within the SENSOR project, that hardly matters.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The only reason why we want to track the sensor issues separately is because its a completely different project and has its own customers. The box uses the sensors and is a bigger project with its own customers. So its necessary for us to track the sensor issues separately.
I understand your point about the issue key. Cant we have a board within the box project which is linked to the sensor project. So if we raise a ticket as an epic in the box project its seen as a story in the sensor project with the box key.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
All valid reasons to have a separate project. This also allows you to customize workflows for the sensors to be different from the BOX project.
Basically, Jira does not allow for any ticket to 'look different' in a different board than in another board/project. An Epic is an Epic and will always look like an Epic in the entire Jira environment.
Let's go back a bit. In the end, you want the option to have a ticket in the SENSOR project that can be linked to an Epic in the BOX project.
Option 1: Do it manually. On the left, you see the BOX-1 ticket which is an Epic, and has 2 BOX Tasks (BOX-2 and BOX-3). On the right, you see the SENSOR project in which I am creating a Task manually, filling in the 'Parent' field as 'BOX-1'. It will then be shown as yet another child of the BOX-1 epic.
Option 2: We create an automation rule that allows people to create a follow-up task in the SENSOR project with information automatically copied from the BOX ticket. This will create a ticket in the SENSOR project with some information preset (for instance: I copied the labels from the Epic, made it child of the Epic in question, Assigned to 'Max Taylor' and copied the description from the Epic. Also, I set the summary as standard text + the Summary from the originating Epic. See below:
Above option is enabled by creating a manual-trigger Automation in your project (which you can tweak/setup to your liking):
Result:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.