Hello,
We are trying to prevent specific users who have access to a specific issue type from seeing said issue type if it is in "x" status. For Example:
Issue type A:
Submitted >> In Progress >> In QA >> Complete
We want User A to be able to see/access Issue Type A when it is in "Submitted", "In Progress", & "Complete" but not when it is "In QA".
We'd like Issue Type A to become "invisible" / inaccessible when it is within that specific status for User A.
Does anyone know of any way we can complete this?
Thanks,
Mike
Hi Michael!
You should be able to use issue security with some automation rules.
You could turn on the issue security when in the "In QA" status and turn it off when on the other statutes. Add the QA users to the issue security rule when it's turned on so they can see it.
Hi Garrett,
Would you be able to explain this a little more? I've read the info within the link attached by Craig below - but I'm still a bit confused.
I've created an issue level security scheme, and added the needed users to it; but I can't figure out how to attach it to the specific status within our workflow.
Thanks,
Mike
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This would need to be done in Jira Automation, not in the Jira Workflow. Have you used Jira Automation?
https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/automation
You would need two automation rules: (use "When Issue transitions"):
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Michael
As a post function on the transition in the workflow.
Have a look at this page.
Jira Server configure-advanced-issue-workflows -- Post-functions
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You can do it in the workflow, and it's arguably a better place to do it because the post-functions you would need run when your users are changing the status of issues.
Also, that automation fires too often, you don't need it to run on edit, you need it done on transition.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
thanks everyone!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Nic Brough -Adaptavist- and @Craig Nodwell It's also fine to do it on the workflow, but make sure that you are not sharing the workflow on any other projects. :)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Correct, but wasn't sure if he's got automation.
He's tagged this with a label as server, the automation solution on server requires a plugin.
I was going on those details.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Good Catch. I am on cloud and it comes with it, and I love the automation!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I like it too :) and it's just one of the many current and planned features selling this old server (since jira 3) guy.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.