I am still learning Jira and trying to understand the best way to organize tasks when working on multiple projects.
Do you normally create separate projects for each type of work, or keep everything in one project?
I would also like to know how experienced Jira users manage priorities and avoid missing important tasks.
Any practical tips or simple workflows would be really helpful.😊
Hi @Mark stewart !
Welcome to Jira! When managing work across multiple projects, the best setup really depends on your team's autonomy, but a general rule of thumb is: create separate projects if the work involves different teams, permission models, or workflows, and keep work in a single project if it's the same team handling everything in one combined board/backlog.
To keep track of priorities across multiple projects without missing anything:
By the way, since there isn't one "single right answer" for project architecture and everybody has unique setups, this would actually make a fantastic Discussion post in the Community groups (rather than a Q&A thread) so more Jira admins and power users can share their favorite workflows!
Hope this helps you get structured!
Thanks @Jean Horn , this makes the project structure much clearer. I especially like the idea of using a dashboard and a saved JQL filter to keep important tasks visible across different projects. The point about separating projects only when teams, permissions, or workflows actually differ is also helpful. I think starting simple and adding structure as the workload grows is a much better approach than overcomplicating Jira from day one. The Advanced Roadmaps suggestion is useful too for teams that need to manage dependencies across projects.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Welcome to Jira @Mark stewart
@Jean Horn and @Martin Runge nailed the core: separate projects when the team, permissions, or workflow genuinely differ; one project when it's the same people and only the task type changes. And Martin's rule is the keeper splitting later is easy, merging back is painful, so when in doubt, start with one.
For not missing things across projects, the native setup that works:
assignee = currentUser() AND statusCategory != Done ORDER BY priority DESC, dueDate ASC — your whole plate in one click.Where that strains is that dashboards are a snapshot you refresh they show what's assigned and overdue, not what's actually at risk right now.
That live picture is what we build at Everview (I'm on the team). It reads your real Jira issues (Jira stays your source of record) into one live view across every project: what's in flight, what's slipping, and what needs attention first, updating as work moves. So the priority call is something you see, not reconstruct.
Every project sits on one canvas with live progress, on-track vs behind, and an "Available" band for uncommitted capacity — and you can click into any project for the effort and dates behind each number.
full canvas — projects side by side, progress + behind/on-track. Demo data.
project detail — target date, Estimated vs Planned. Demo data.
We're On the Atlassian Marketplace if you'd like a look: Everview.ai
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks @Melika-Everview This is a really practical way to look at it. I like the distinction between simply seeing overdue work and actually knowing what is starting to slip, because those are not always the same thing. The “start simple, split only when there’s a real reason” rule makes sense to me too. A live cross-project view could definitely save time for teams that are constantly jumping between projects and trying to piece together the bigger picture.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I recently wrote an article on how to handle dependencies across different stacks on a SW development environment, I think you might find it helpful if you reuse the concept for cross-project even for non-SW developments.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks @Laura Marin - Millarum , that’s a useful angle. I hadn’t really thought about applying the dependency concept from software stacks to broader cross-project work, but it makes sense when several projects rely on each other. I’ll take a look at the article, especially the part about visualizing those dependencies. That could be a good way to spot blockers before they start affecting the wider project timeline.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I would build on Jean's answer with a simple question I ask myself before creating a new project: Does this work really need to live on its own?
I create a separate project when:
I keep it all in one project when the same people are doing the work and only the type of task changes. The part I would really keep in mind: splitting things into a new project later is easy, but pulling them back together is often painful for you as an admin and users. So when I am not sure, I start with one project and only split it out once there is a clear reason to.
Cheers, Martin
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks @Martin Runge I like the “does this work really need to live on its own?” test—it’s a much easier way to decide than creating a project for every new type of task. The point about merging projects later being painful is especially worth remembering. I’d probably start with one setup, watch where the workflow or permissions become a problem, and only then split things out. That keeps Jira cleaner and gives you a clear reason for every project you create.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Mark stewart,
The cross-project filter and dashboard setup suggested here is the right foundation. If you're open to also trying an app from the Atlassian Marketplace, JXL for Jira can help with the day-to-day working part. Specifically, its sheets allow you to see and edit work items from any number of projects in one spreadsheet-like table:
Here's a multi-project grouping in action:

Disclosure: I work for the team that builds JXL.
All the best,
Ivan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
One thing I’d add is to keep the structure simple at first.
When managing multiple projects, it can be tempting to create more projects, priorities, or custom workflows to keep everything organized. But that can make Jira harder to maintain over time.
I’d start with:
In my experience, it’s much easier to add structure later than to clean up unnecessary configuration once it has accumulated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks @봄빛 I agree with keeping the setup lean in the beginning. It’s easy to think more workflows and custom priorities will make everything clearer, but they can quickly become another thing to manage. A few well-defined priorities plus a useful dashboard can cover a lot without adding unnecessary complexity. I’d also review the setup occasionally as the team grows, rather than changing everything at once. Simple now usually means fewer headaches later.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.