We are using automation quite a lot, and we have a few scenarios where we want to do something specific (same flow) but have different triggers for it.
These triggers include events and scheduled runs, and can be different from one to the other in:
We currently have a few copies of the same automation rule, each one with a different trigger, and we were wondering if it wouldn't be better to have a single flow (conditions and actions) that can be used in multiple rules or even better, in a single rule with multiple triggering mechanisms.
Hi @Omer Meshar
As @Marc -Devoteam- describes, there is no automation rule trigger to cover both scheduled and work item events. There is a multiple-event trigger, and in my opinion I recommend never using that one due to racetrack timing problems, possible multiple triggering defects, unknown side effects, etc.
Without seeing the specifics of your rules and the scenarios, I recommend pausing to understand the problem being solved by the rules...and thus decide if some of them can be combined in ways to eliminate any duplication.
For specific workarounds to reduce rule / logic duplication, those tend to be complicated. For example:
Regardless of the approach used, combining rules may lead to unintended consequences: more complexity, more difficult maintenance, rule processing side effects, difficultly in detecting and solving problems from overlaps, unnecessary permission granting, etc. Please consider discussing this with your peer Product Admins to help understand the risk / rewards involved.
Kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.