Use Case: Create a flow that performs a cross Space/Project Update triggered by a field change in Space/Project ABC. When a specific field, SyncSource, in Space ABC (typical JIRA space) changes, it triggers a corresponding change to a specific field, SyncTarget, in Space XYZ (a JPD space).
Issue: The flow does execute successfully however it does not seem to return a list of records from the JPD space that matches the JQL criteria.
Details:
I’ve tried executing the flow with the scope set to:
Actor config:
Audit log:
If I tweak and manually run the JQL it does return the expected result set.
For example:
Result set:
Sample of the current flow:
Trigger (based on field in JIRA space ABC)
└─ Field value changed
└─ Field: SyncSource
Lookup Issues (query across all spaces)
└─ JQL: issue in linkedIssues("{{issue.key}}")
Advanced Branching (operates on record set from above)
└─ Variable name: linkedIssue
└─ Smart value: {{lookupIssues}}
Edit Issue Fields (updates result set from JPD spaces)
└─ SyncTarget = {{issue.SyncSource}}
Hello @Jack Wilkins
First Question, and i asking that without really reading Automation as it will be thing for Later. Did it worked before, or Started to make Problems just Suddenly ?
We have some Problems from Yesterday around Automations so it could be related.
Best,
Arek🤠
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Try this
Trigger
└─ Field value changed
└─ Field: SyncSource
Condition
└─ Space/project equals ABC
Branch rule / related work items
└─ Linked work items
└─ Select the relevant link type, or all link types
Condition
└─ Space/project equals XYZ
Optional: Work type equals Idea
Log action
└─ Source={{triggerIssue.key}}
Target={{issue.key}}
Value={{triggerIssue.customfield_12345}}
Edit work item
└─ SyncTarget={{triggerIssue.customfield_12345}}
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, I get the same results.
The messages in the log are the same as I previously got:
ABC-1234
We recommend using the 'Issue fields condition' for more consistent results.
Any thoughts? BTW, our system is using the "newer" flow UX.
Thanks - Jack
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.