Hello All,
I was wondering if anyone had Jira best practices with the following concept.
Each of our teams are focused in a specific technology area or layer for code that goes the code base for our switch products. This means that for each software release we get tasked with 1 or more requests. Sometimes these requests are for support of a new feature or capability. Sometimes these requests are for enhancements, defect reduction or quality improvements. We regularly get unexpected or unplanned work. How do you structure/create projects that can handle a never-ending stream of issues without also creating an unwieldy amount of historical information?
The pattern we have been following is that for each software release we will create a new Jira project. For items that we were tracking in the previous project, I can move them to the new one now that they are going to be delivered in the next software release. These allow us a way to go back and see what we delivered specifically during a set time window. Within each project, we’ll have different Epics to cover the main areas where we have issues or stories that need tracked and worked on. Each new project will carry over a couple common Epics as well as have new ones for the new major requests that my team gets.
Is there another pattern that can be followed that might be better than what we are doing?
Thanks in Advance,
Mani.
I think I'd keep one project with multiple versions
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi!
How do you planning of your work?
Which methodology or combine of methodologies do you using?
Also, have you using burndown charts? Have you trying to do retro after improvements of your work.
Unfortunately, to my understand, you can not find a silver bullet. Otherwise, why in the world a lot methodologies :)
Let's start to check this one:
https://www.atlassian.com/customers
Also, it will be good if you provide more detail info:
1. Industry
2. Service/product orientied company or just outsource
3. Capacity
4. Release cycle
5. QA
6. Which tool do you using for plan?
7. Most reason the problem from retro feedback?
Cheers,
Gonchik Tsymzhitov
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Did you catch the news at Team ‘25? With Loom, Confluence, Atlassian Intelligence, & even Jira 👀, you won’t have to worry about taking meeting notes again… unless you want to. Join us to explore the beta & discover a new way to boost meeting productivity.
Register today!Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.