im trying to turn on an automation, where;
- summary includes the exact phrase "Invoicing 2.0 ran successfully on CSL", and
- reporter = BeelineDBATeam@beeline.com
in that scenario, i need to;
- remove all participants
- add the label "CSL"
- Assign to user Ezra Bibby
_ resolve the ticket
ive been trying for a few hours, cant get it right
Hi @ezra bibby , thanks for your post.
Stealing this from the great @Marc - Devoteam
Whenever you ask for help with an Automation Rule it will help us to help you if you provide:
1. what type of project is this (e.g., company-managed, team-managed, etc.),
2. images that show your complete rule.
3. images showing the details of the actions/conditions/branches.
4. images showing the Audit Log details for the rule execution.
5. images showing the relevant data in an image that is part of the rule execution.
6. Explain where the issue is.
These questions are not for not willing to help, but to have community members learn on how automation works.
Not just to provide a full solution, which would not help to understand what the automation is doing, but to have members understand what a rule is doing, if in need of change or error.
Please can you share some more information, including screens, audit logs? It will be difficult for us to help you troubleshoot without some more detail.
Thanks
thx Valerie :-)
hope you can help!! :-)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @ezra bibby and @Valerie Knapp
Your rule uses Lookup Issues to gather the issues, tries to branch over the issue data, and then tries to modify the issues. That is what the error is indicating (even though it is poorly worded): the Edit Issue action needs an issue and one is not provided.
Lookup Issues is used to gather issues, such as to sum a value from a field or report on them. It cannot access them for edits.
For the scenario you describe, your rule could instead use the JQL from the action with the Scheduled trigger, and remove the branch completely.
For example:
And from what you show, several of the update / edit actions should be merged to update most of the fields at one time; this will improve rule performance and prevent problems.
Kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
thankyou @Bill Sheboy !
i really got tangled on that one lol... works now, and is so much neater!
ive had it set at 2 mins for testing, but will revert to the right trigger now, thx again!!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Awesome; I am glad to learn the community was able to help!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
In the wake of growing customer expectations, development teams are facing more pressure to deliver innovations faster. Register for this 45-minute webinar to learn how devs can accelerate software delivery and time-to-market with Jira Service Management.
Register now 🚀Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.