The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)

×

Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Using Epics for service desk

Neal Goodwin
March 21, 2018

Hello all,

 

I am trying to use Epics within an enterprise service desk to cleanly delineate between tasks associated with the different systems we are supporting. I am trying to use Epics to do this, and am coming across some issues. This is a two part question.

 

1) is there a better way to put tasks into distinct buckets than using Epics? I have more experience administering and running projects in Jira software, and have had a lot of success doing this via Epics in the software portion

2) assuming Epics are the best, or a way to do this, how to I configure them to work appropriately? I recently created my service desk, and have added "Epic Link" to the add/edit/view issue screens. I then created a few epics for the buckets I want to seperate tasks into. Then when I go to create a new issue in the service desk, the Epics are listed as "unlabelled-[project key]"

 

Any thoughts?

 

Thanks,

Neal

1 answer

Comments for this post are closed

Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.

0 votes
Sam Griffin
April 10, 2019

If you have a defined set of systems (a, b, c) then you could use labels instead.  You could still report on and queue them using the lanes as your defining factor.  So the tickets would all be tasks (or whatever) and you’d query (issuetype = task AND labels = “a”).  Between boards, queues, and dashboards this would let you report on and sort the tasks without having to use epics or any specific type of issue type.

TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events