The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)

×

Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Issue linking custom asset object to request type

J Conners
Contributor
December 6, 2023

Using OOB ITSM project template and OOB Employee and ITAssets for Assets templates.

Added attribute "Assigned to" type: Object: Employee on "Hardware Assets" objects, which is outbound reference to Employee:Employee objectType which contains attribute AtlassianUser type User.

Attempting to add "Hardware Assets" sub objectType: Laptops, objectType: Monitors objectType: "Docking Stations" to request issue type Service Request and request issue type Incident.

asset custom objects created and added to Create and view/edit screens for Service Request issue type and Incident request issue type

Affected Hardware

object schema: IT Assets

  • objectType = "Hardware Assets"
  • Filter scope: "Assigned to".AtlassianUser = ${reporter}

Affected Laptops

  • objectType = Laptops
  • Filter scope: "Assigned to".AtlassianUser = ${reporter}

Affected Monitors

  • objectType = Monitors
  • Filter scope: "Assigned to".AtlassianUser = ${reporter}

Should the filter scope be: outR("Assigned to".Atlassian.User = ${reporter}   ????

Is there an issue with AQL because object hierarchy does not contain unique names?

(Object Schema: Employees --> objectType: Employees  ????

0 answers

Comments for this post are closed

Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.

DEPLOYMENT TYPE
CLOUD
PRODUCT PLAN
PREMIUM
PERMISSIONS LEVEL
Product Admin
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events