Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Does anyone else find the upcoming limitation of 50 grants per permissions scheme as unrealistic?

Tim Bonney
Contributor
July 27, 2026

Starting in September, they are planning on enforcing a limitation to the number of grants per permissions scheme of 50 total grants. I do understand the rationale for this. However, in my opinion, it is completely unrealistic that we could achieve this limitation.

From what I have seen, most of our permission schemes have in the neighborhood of 45 permissions on each. For example, we have one that has 46 permissions on it, which means only 4 of those can have more than 1 grant applied in any one scheme.

Additionally, making it even more unrealistic is the fact that the 'atlassian-addons-project-access' gets automatically applied to each permission by Atlassian if you have any add-on apps (which I assume nearly everyone has at least one of as they are extremely common for expansion of functionality). We did not create this role, we cannot prevent its usage, and in many cases we cannot safely remove it without a negative impact to application functionality. However, once you factor the automatic additional and assignment of this role into the process, it leaves only 5 permissions in total that we are able to self-assign.

I hope we are not the only customers to be in this predicament. Please share your thoughts on this Atlassian-planned restriction. Thanks for your insight.

5 answers

1 accepted

4 votes
Answer accepted
Tim Bonney
Contributor
July 27, 2026

Sorry all. I jumped the gun on submitting this. I have just found out from Atlassian that the limit of 50 grants is on each individual permission within a scheme, not a grand total for the entire scheme.

Sorry for any alarm and/or confusion as a result of my premature submission on this discussion group.

Michael Hamilton
July 29, 2026

Noob question but in their vernacular is "Grants" now the new code word for the "Assigned To" count?

Like Joe Radford likes this
Celina Kincaid
Contributor
July 30, 2026

The in app messaging is extremely poor.  I read it the same way you did and was freaking out a bit.  

Like Philippe Kromer likes this
Tim Bonney
Contributor
July 31, 2026

@Michael Hamilton

Yes, that is correct. What they are referring to is that each person or group being granted/given access to each permission in the scheme is considered 1 "Grant", and they will only be allowing a maximum of 50 per permission.

Jeremy Wood
Contributor
August 7, 2026

Thank you for the clarification. I was just starting to go down the same spiral of "How am i going to make this work". Atlassian should really adjust the warning message for this. 

 

For anyone looking for official document with the per permission wording i found the below: 

Data limits and guardrails
2026-08-07_17-15-39.jpg

3 votes
Bill Goetz
Contributor
August 3, 2026

Started seeing a yellow "Starting in September, permissions will be limited to 50 grants" message today in our instance. After selecting the Optimize link it then shows a report with the ### number of grants.

perms scheme calcs.png

If the 50 grants is per project permission type, then Atlassian needs to clarify this in their message. The grant number in the optimize link report also gives the impression I'm way over. As I look at this more objectively, it makes Atlassian sense, but I think a lot of admins are gonna freak out, like Tim and myself. :-P

 

 

 

1 vote
Ryan Gillespie
Contributor
August 4, 2026

A support rep actually just sent me to this thread to tell me other people are bringing it up. He didn't mention though that it is PER line item. Confirming now in that support ticket. I certainly hope its as you guys mentioned, and its per item. That's easy to stay within. 50 across the entire thing? Especially when addons is a forced line item everywhere? That's about impossible.

Ryan Gillespie
Contributor
August 5, 2026

Rep confirmed on my end too. It is 50 per line item. So a limit of 50 to Browse Space. A limit of 50 to Add Attachment, etc.

0 votes
Johannes Werner
I'm New Here
I'm New Here
Those new to the Atlassian Community have posted less than three times. Give them a warm welcome!
August 7, 2026

Thank you @Tim Bonney for this post.

And it is not on you.

It is on Atlassian for phrasing this in the most mis-understandable way possible.

I clicked on the "optimize check"y thing and this also only showed a total, to reinforce this misunderstanding.

@Atlassian shouldn't you know better by now?


 

0 votes
Savannah Ehrhardt
Contributor
August 5, 2026

Even Rovo misinterpreted the banner when I asked it about it :/

Ryan Gillespie
Contributor
August 5, 2026

I feel like Rovo misinterprets most things ... 

Seriously, I cannot count on two hands the number of random hidden settings Rovo has suggested I change or look into that just don't exist. Usually from some feature setup that hasn't existed in 3 years. Or when it told me there were special Bitbucket audit log features you get for premium that have never existed.

Like Savannah Ehrhardt likes this
Savannah Ehrhardt
Contributor
August 5, 2026

It also likes to correct me about Jira spaces being called projects and spaces only existing in Confluence 

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
DEPLOYMENT TYPE
CLOUD
PRODUCT PLAN
STANDARD
PERMISSIONS LEVEL
Product Admin
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events