Hello everyone,
We are using Atlassian Assets for the first time and are currently planning to move all our IT assets to Jira.
We are struggling with the question of how best to structure our Asset schemas.
Would you recommend:
What are the pros and cons of both approaches based on your experience?
And which approach would you recommend for a larger organization?
Any best practices, lessons learned, or recommendations would be very welcome.
Thank you very much for your help!
LG,
Anna
Hello Anna, and welcome to the Atlassian Community! 👋
First of all, congratulations on taking the leap into Jira Service Management Assets. It is an incredibly powerful tool, and you are asking the absolute most important question right now. Getting the architecture right from day one will save your team a lot of headaches down the road!
For a larger organization, do not put everything into one massive schema. It is highly recommended to use Separate Asset schemas grouped by data ownership or business domains (e.g., IT, HR, Facilities), and then link them together using cross-schema references.
Here is a detailed breakdown of both approaches based on best practices:
Go with a hybrid, domain-based approach. Create schemas based on who owns the data. For example:
You can easily link an Employee (from the HR schema) to a Laptop (in the ITAM schema) using Cross-schema object references.
I hope this helps you plan your deployment, Anna! Asset management is a journey, so take your time planning the architecture. If you found this answer helpful, please consider clicking Accept Answer so other community members facing the same challenge can find it easily.
Let us know if you need help setting up the reference attributes!
Hello @Jean Horn ,
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation. Your recommendation gives us a very good direction.
Thanks again for your advice!
Best regards,
Anna
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Anna Kochura !
You're very welcome! I'm glad to hear that the recommendation was helpful for you.
If you run into any other questions or need further guidance down the road, feel free to reach out to the community anytime.
Best regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I would always suggest to use at least 2 schemas.
I like to have users and their affiliated relations (like locations, etc...) in a separate schema as this most of the time is used in multiple spaces.
Applications and Devices could be in a different schema, based on the amount you cloud decide to have separate schemas as well.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.