The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)

×

Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Automation concepts – Heads-up for your decoder ring / terms glossary updates

Estimated time to read: 1 minute

 

TL;DR: the renaming of stuff has reached automation rules...again.

 

This is a quick heads-up for more name changes based upon last / this week's release blog changes...this time for automation rules.  Apparently...

  • "Rule" will soon be called "Flow"
  • "Components" will soon be called "Steps"

There is no information provided by the blog entry if the underlying / exported JSON will change to these new terms.  And, as everything internally is a "component", it is unclear if the underlying / exported JSON will also perhaps rename those all at some point, including:

  • trigger
  • action
  • condition
  • branch
  • special components to handle branch structures
  • nested components to handle trigger-conditions, conditions in branches, etc.
  • etc.

I hypothesize the JSON will not change, as "project" was not renamed to "space" and "issue" was not renamed to "work item"; same thing for the event references to those things, such as jira:issue_created.

 

Please let me know your feedback on this article, and as always...happy rule flow writing!

 

2 comments

Comments for this post are closed

Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new comments.

Darryl Lee
Community Champion
April 23, 2026

The Like is for the article, not the change. Thanks @Bill Sheboy :-}

Like # people like this
Paulo
Community Champion
April 24, 2026

Hi @Bill Sheboy , just want to say thanks to your contributions to the Atlassian Community forums. I work mostly on in-person community events, so I dont write us much here as I wish due to lack of time, but I read your contributions a lot.

Regarding your hypothesis, I think it's natural that Atlassian might still keep the old names in backend systems (REST APIs, JSON objects, etc), because of backwards compatibility.
I wouldn't be surprised if the backend names remain for a couple more years, or even if they only update them when they launch a new API version. 

Like # people like this
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events