Managing dependencies in Jira becomes challenging once multiple teams or projects are involved. Jira allows you to link issues, but understanding those relationships at scale is much harder.
Below is a short guide on how Jira handles dependencies, why teams struggle, and how to visualize them more clearly.
Jira uses issue link types such as:
blocks / is blocked by
depends on / is depended on by
relates to
These links show sequencing and blockers, but inside the issue they appear as a flat, unstructured list, which quickly becomes hard to interpret especially when many dependencies or cross-project links are involved.
Common challenges include:
No grouping or hierarchy in Linked Issues
Blockers mixed with non-critical links
Cross-project links look the same as local ones
Timeline (Roadmap) arrows overlap and become confusing
No clear flow for long dependency chains
This often leads teams to use spreadsheets or diagrams, which instantly become outdated.
Teams can keep dependencies manageable by:
Using consistent link types
Reviewing dependencies every sprint
Limiting long chains of blockers
Surfacing cross-project dependencies early
Avoiding “relates to” for critical paths
Visualizing dependencies frequently, not just during planning
Many teams need a way to visualize dependencies directly inside the issue where work happens.
Marketplace apps can help by offering:
Grouped dependency lists
Graph views
Matrix views
Color-coded link types
Cross-project visibility
Link-type governance
For example, our team built , which provides clear graph and matrix views inside Jira issues and helps standardize link types across projects.
Jira’s native linking works for simple cases but becomes difficult at scale. Clear visualization and consistent link usage improve planning, reduce blockers, and give teams better visibility across projects.
If you want examples or want to discuss how others manage dependencies, feel free to reply I’m happy to share more.
Karim Belhadj
1 comment