You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
I would like to get the communities input on different ways you have configured 1 jira project to track the work of 3 different work streams.
1 backlog, 3 work streams
Between 3-6 Phases within each Epic and multiple tasks that needs to be performed within each phase.
The Epics, Phases & Tasks are the same for all of the work streams.
Currently I'm leaning towards creating the different works streams as components, but I'm not sure how best to represent the different phases, Perhaps as releases?
I would really appreciate some input.
Have you thought about utilizing multiple boards in one project.
Project manager, product owner want a combined board with one backlog for all workstreams, so be it. Splitting up the workstreams into components would work, as long as you do not need this field otherwise.
The teams working on the workstream might need their own board that is filtered to display only the work items from that workstream.
In regards to 3-6 Phases within each Epic, that sounds to me like unique workflow for epics and each status representing one phase.