Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root


1 badge earned


Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!


Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.


Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!


Come for the products,
stay for the community

The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.

Atlassian Community about banner
Community Members
Community Events
Community Groups

So important to have Archive function

Knowing that archive issue function in JIRA is only opened in some mode of subscription. Basically cloud standard / free version do not open this feature. 
It's truly inconvenient in terms of project management. Maybe this is considered a pricing strategy behind.

But as an user, we would think this is a basic function to allow user archive the completed and infrequent accessing issue, which is to eliminate and free up space. 

And as a popular brand in Project Management Tool, this is definitely an important function to allow user manage their task properly. If this function need to pay higher subscription cost, then I'm really sure it disappointed a lot of supportive customer.  


Really looking for JIRA enable this feature for most of the subscription level.


1 comment

Mayur Jadhav
Community Leader
Community Leader
Community Leaders are connectors, ambassadors, and mentors. On the online community, they serve as thought leaders, product experts, and moderators.
Sep 08, 2021

Hi @Steven 

See as you mentioned Archive is a very important feature of Jira right, then why the Atlassian will give in the free or standard plan.

Um... It depends on your what you think, whether a common, basic, important function should be paid by Advance plan. 

In the contrary, I think it's more proper when additional & powerful function / service / space is required, it's definitely reasonable to pay more to entitle it.

For me, common and critical features of a product should be included in order to maintain the competitive in the market. This is also what our company principle when positioning our products.

If that is the way, why not all important functions need additional pay or only available in Premium Subscription.    

Like Mayur Jadhav likes this


Log in or Sign up to comment