Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in
Deleted user
0 / 0 points
badges earned

Your Points Tracker
  • Global
  • Feed

Badge for your thoughts?

You're enrolled in our new beta rewards program. Join our group to get the inside scoop and share your feedback.

Join group
Give the gift of kudos
You have 0 kudos available to give
Who do you want to recognize?
Why do you want to recognize them?
Great job appreciating your peers!
Check back soon to give more kudos.

Past Kudos Given
No kudos given
You haven't given any kudos yet. Share the love above and you'll see it here.

It's not the same without you

Join the community to find out what other Atlassian users are discussing, debating and creating.

Atlassian Community Hero Image Collage

Fewer or more issue types?

we need to implement a classification of jira worklogs for reporting.

some example reports may be:

* distinguish between billable and not billable hours,

* hours spent according to activities (analysis, development, testing, ...),

* hours spent on bugs reported by customers vs. found internally

* hours covered by a contract (internal hours, covered by contract, not covered but paid, covered and unpaid)

* etc.


that's why we need to classify the worklogs in more dimensions.

for the activities (analysis, design, implementation, testing, ...) we plan to use attributes (tempo work attribute or issue custom field).

for the other reports we need to distinguish whether the work is paid by the customer or is internal. we have come with 2 solutions:

1. distinguish the type of work by the issue type (e.g. Bug/Incident is internal cost, support activities are paid, work on change requests is paid, ...), which implies to have multiple issue types (> 10) in every project

2. distinguish the type of work by custom field attributes in combination with issue type

we're not in agreement which one would be better for us, so i'd like to hear your opinions and arguments on what solution you'd prefer or which approach did you choose for similar use case.

thank you



1 comment

Hi Karol, 

As I think about this I end up with more questions than suggestions. How do you determine (regardless of the tool) if work is paid for by a customer or internal? Also, what is the difference between billable and non-billable and the customer pays or its paid internally? 

From what you described, a separate issue type would not likely be the ideal solution. Although it is one way to make a distinction for a type of work, issue types are usually ALSO distinct in their workflow, screens, fields etc. Is it also true that who pays for the work also determines the workflow the team uses to accomplish the work? 

I'm guessing a lot may have changed since you wrote this post, but I'm curious how it turned out for you?



Log in or Sign up to comment

Community Events

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find an event

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.

Host an event

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events

Events near you