You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
I want to build a formula that helps me identify features that are "high impact" and "low effort". Therefore, I would like to build a weighted formula that takes into account "Score" and "Effort". Where:
Right now as implemented for weighted formulas, both are calculated/normalized to be "higher is better".
Hi everyone, this change is coming up soon. Note that you can also use a "write your own" formula to do that today.
Do you have an estimated date when it will be rolled out? It's a bit silly now to have the effort score in reverse order (e.g. 1 dot is high effort and 3 dots is low effort) 🙈
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
We don't generally share release dates.
In the meantime, you can try:
What we're going to ship here is basically a convenience UI to achieve the same result
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
It's really needed feature that you can select if value is positive or negative (if number 5 is good or bad thing). We are missing a lot if we can't use weighted score with rating fields when using impact vs effort (or other similar) framework
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Seth Mason : what @Jonathan Hau said!
Here's a demo: https://www.loom.com/share/a09506455d6b4571a912567d5df4169b
Also, you can use negative numbers in the weighted score (e.g. impact = 200, effort = -100) but I'm not sure how mathematically accurate it is. We've seen users doing that though
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I think this can be easily solved by writing an Expression that inverts the value of the weighting in the calculated score. Or divides by effort. For example if using RICE scoring model: 2* (([Reach]+[Impact]+[Confidence])/[Effort])
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I also came across the same issue.
As is
- I'm currently using the values of the effort field in the oppoosite (wrong) direction in order to make the calculation right.
To be
- User should be able to indicate whether a criteria is contributing to the score in the positive or negative direction
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Just came across the same issue, if not using RICE this solution isn't really helpful. I agree with Riku that you should be able to indicate if a scoring field is positive or negative.
Where impact score includes effort, the lowest effort should be able to be weighted highest if required.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.