You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
I want to build a formula that helps me identify features that are "high impact" and "low effort". Therefore, I would like to build a weighted formula that takes into account "Score" and "Effort". Where:
Right now as implemented for weighted formulas, both are calculated/normalized to be "higher is better".
We don't generally share release dates.
In the meantime, you can try:
What we're going to ship here is basically a convenience UI to achieve the same result
Here's a demo: https://www.loom.com/share/a09506455d6b4571a912567d5df4169b
Also, you can use negative numbers in the weighted score (e.g. impact = 200, effort = -100) but I'm not sure how mathematically accurate it is. We've seen users doing that though
I also came across the same issue.
- I'm currently using the values of the effort field in the oppoosite (wrong) direction in order to make the calculation right.
- User should be able to indicate whether a criteria is contributing to the score in the positive or negative direction
Just came across the same issue, if not using RICE this solution isn't really helpful. I agree with Riku that you should be able to indicate if a scoring field is positive or negative.
Where impact score includes effort, the lowest effort should be able to be weighted highest if required.