Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in
Celebration

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root

Avatar

1 badge earned

Collect

Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!

Challenges
Coins

Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.

Recognition
Ribbon

Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!

Leaderboard

Come for the products,
stay for the community

The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.

Atlassian Community about banner
4,553,566
Community Members
 
Community Events
184
Community Groups

Does anyone have documentation on Agilecraft rounding for WSJF?

In looking at the WSJF numbers, rounding at two decimal positions appears to be performed.

In reviewing numbers, sometimes the value is rounded in the standard manner but sometimes it is rounded down and sometimes it is rounded up instead.

With no apparent logic.

3 answers

1 accepted

0 votes
Answer accepted

Just noticed (this is the cloud version)

 

If you enter the numbers from the Feature Estimation page it works properly.

If you enter the number from the Feature details pane, it does not.

If you enter the numbers from the Feature Estimation page and then go to the Feature detail pane, the numbers on the detail pane will be recalculated on display.

etc. (I am not going to figure out all the nuances of this).

Derek Huether
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
Jul 28, 2020 • edited

Jeffrey, I was able to reproduce the 3rd decimal number rounding issue

In one instance it appears to round and the other it appears to truncate.

I'm happy to submit it as a bug on your behalf. 

 

Everything looks good for the 1st and 2nd decimal number calculations.

Please submit a bug on my behalf.

Thank you.

Like Derek Huether likes this
Derek Huether
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
Aug 04, 2020

Jeffrey, I just wanted to let you know that your rounding issue is officially on the internal team's backlog to fix. I don't have a commitment date but know that you did find something.

The workaround is to have additional conversations, when epics have a WSJF score that is the same (out to the 3rd decimal point). Being the inputs are following a Fibonacci series, the output is to support a relative comparison, to support you in your prioritization endeavors. 

Best,

Derek

0 votes
Derek Huether
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
Dec 11, 2021

@Jeffrey Multach the fix will appear in v10.103.0

0 votes
Derek Huether
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
Jul 24, 2020

Jeffrey,
Could you please post a picture of the values in question, to allow us to further investigate?
Just post a picture here that looks something like this:

Screen Shot 2020-07-24 at 5.51.43 PM.png

Thanks!

Other values which end in .005 also do not round in a standard manner. For example:

0 0 1 40

0 0 5 8

Derek Huether
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
Jul 27, 2020

Jeffrey, I agree with you.
That does not look right. I did the same calculation and I get 3.63.
 Screen Shot 2020-07-27 at 9.06.53 AM.png

This could be a bug that has been resolved.

I'm on Cloud 10.75.

What are you running?

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events