Hey Atlassian project managers,
You removed the support of nested tables in Confluence cloud, so we can't create anymore tables in a list or in another table for example....
Please tell us why you removed this feature ? If you write documents, this is used a lot, don't you know about this ? Maybe you use another software ?
I don't thank you, really.
Removing nested tables is a blockheaded decision at best. Structure in a HTML document comes from nested tables. No nested tables? No structure. Yeah, fallback to bulleted lists or something? Nope.
Don't bore me with "workarounds" when it's hard to make people even start using Confluence in the first place.
This is the situation of a manufacturer deciding to remove the wheels from a wheelchair because these are then easier to implement, test and paint in silly colors.
Once UX designers and "focus groups" are ensconced in a decision process, it's over I guess. Oh yeah, that reminds me. That "flat look" is fugly. Just saying.
Thanks for all the workaround.
But be honestly. This is just a bad change.
It makes confluence a bad tool for creating any detailed technical documents. You have to spend lot of time just try to make the layout more readable ? But you can do this in seconds with words or google doc...
Just wonder what is the road map of Confluence?
We used to use Confluence build detailed technical documents. But we can no longer do that.
It just silly if we need other tools to write documents then put them into Confluence.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
OMG - would it not be just easier to bring back the ability to just create a table within a table? What purpose did removing that ability have, even within the context of the New & "Improved" editor?
I insisted on having Confluence at my new job as I relied on it so much at my last one, but honestly these improvements may turn out to be dealbreakers for me
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Gotta love the sentiment on https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CONFCLOUD-58656 which basically reassures me that I don't need nested tables.
Well, I spent the last 1.5 hours trying to force Confluence to give me nested tables (or even nested note panels inside other note panels) because they ARE ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to effectively coordinate content reviews amongst my users.
I'll be making sure to add Atlassian's "we know better" and "whatever's easiest to code" attitude to our growing list of reasons to change platforms.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Amazing the sort of stuff that gets removed. Guess some UI expert knew better than us simple users...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I have another approach using the Multiexcerpt macro:
In the example below "Notes" is the page where I create the individual tables, each surrounded by a MultiExcerpt and a title that explains where it goes.
Next, use the Multiexcerpt include macro and insert it the correct data into the into the main table
Save the page and it looks like this:
I hope that this helps.
-Michael
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You can nest tables inside other tables but not directly.
There are several ways but one I know is as follows
(I just did a bunch of them)
1. Insert an Info macro in the table cell of interest.
2. Build the sub-table inside the Info macro.
Note: You can't generally copy an existing table into the Info macro.
Workaround is to create the sub-table there, then copy/paste the info from the source table to the new target table, row by row.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks! I had to create an Info macro outside of the original table, then insert the table into the info macro, then copy that info macro into the original table. That worked!
It's critical to have nested tables for the technical documentation I'm doing.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I completely agree. I am trying to move a template to a different space which you cannot do either, which seems like a poor design not having this feature, you can move pages to other spaces, why not a template, and it has nested tables. We have been using this template for years and now because we are reorganizing we cannot have a new template with nested table to match the existing template.
Atlassian - Is there ever going to be a fix for this issue? Or what is your best solution to this issue?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
odd that it was changed...the above is a poor workaround. would be interested in hearing the Atlasssian approach for this newly added 'feature'.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Michael, this was the best workaround I found (till Atlassian decides to fix this mess) reading all other comments in this and many other threads related to this problem.
I however used the Excerpt and Excerpt Include macros.
Cheers
-Paul Angelo
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
About an hour a go I added a comment about how bad it is that Confluence does not support nested tables. After using Confluence for a bit I realized that when I had nested tables the nested table was always in column 2. To get around it I took the info in column 1 and called it a heading then added the table in column two under the heading. Not for everyone but it seems to work for me. I just looked at what I did in a few hours with Confluence and am quite proud of what I have created. My first Wiki. Thanks Confluence!!!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Since posting my workaround above using excerpts to nest tables, our Confluence instance has been updated and we're now using 7.8.3. In this version I'm able to nest tables to my heart's content by simply adding a table inside the cell of another table. No workarounds necessary! Not sure when this behavior changed but I'm glad it is now simple to do.
I should note that we're using the server edition.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This is a very bad product decision. We are moving to the Cloud version and use nested tables heavily in EVERY page.
I can't see any of the workarounds being a replacement for (quick) editing.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The spreadsheet file has to be uploaded/attached/included on the Confluence page so as long as someone has edit permissions on the page, ownership shouldn't be an issue. Granted, editing it is more cumbersome than editing a Confluence page/table directly.
Google Sheets can be downloaded as .xlsx files and then uploaded to Confluence.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Unfortunately I'm not working with the cloud product, so I can't try out solutions. My env is enterprise server. But this has me intrigued since I do nest tables and would get hammered if my env gets moved to the cloud.
So dumb question. Have you tried creating the child table in an included macro like Panel, Excerpt, Page properties, Section/Column (either or combined), Indent, TOC Zone and then move that macro into the cell in the parent table?
All these worked for me in server and Column (sans Section) and Page properties minimized white space around the child table. Of course the table greatly expands when editing due to the included macro(s).
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Aside from trying to keep data single-sourced in Confluence, what happens when either the owner of the Excel file leaves without transferring owners or your company wants to move from Office to Google?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Put your data in an excel spread sheet and use the Office Excel macro to include it on your page?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
An additional workaround that I don't believe is described above:
If you have the Source Editor plug-in installed, you can use it to copy and paste the source code of the sub-table into the main table.
It'll look something like this (I did not include the full table formatting for brevity) :
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Title1</th>
<th>Title2</th>
<th>Title3</th>
<th>Title4</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>
Basic Content
</td>
<td colspan="1">
<p>Provide basic concept info:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="1">Heading1</th>
<td colspan="1">Content 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="1">Heading2</th>
<td colspan="1">Content 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Heading3</th>
<td>Content 3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td><br /></td>
<td><br /></td>
<td><br /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
</td>
...
</tbody>
</table>
Note: Confluence Cloud does not play nicely with the Source Editor plug-in, even though it is supposedly supported. Confluence will automatically inject gross spacing formatting if you dare to open the normal editor functions after making adjustments to the source code.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.