we love confluence, but we have to constantly fight to keep 'what is documented officially' from 'being polluted by stuff that is not yet well organized'.
You probably know the situation yourselves, someone creates some page but then never finishes it, or it has many TBD sections, and over time, it's just not clear anymore, what part of the internal documentation is official and useful, and what is not. This again erodes confidence in the documentation in the first place.
How do you all solve this problem?
I imagine some sort of git-like workflow whereby anyone can create 'forks' (new versions/updates) of a page, and then commit it back, is then reviewed (has to be reviewed) by one or more page owners. This way, there's a clear gatekeeper defined, while still allowing anyone to contribute.
Is this possible with confluence?
Are there good alternative solutions to this?
It’s been great to hear from fellow users over the last few weeks about the best tips and fun moments you’ve had working on Confluence since the transition to working remote. I’d love to keep the c...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find an event
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.Host an event
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events