Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

It's not the same without you

Join the community to find out what other Atlassian users are discussing, debating and creating.

Atlassian Community Hero Image Collage

What about version in pom.xml for feature branches?

I'm new to git, feature branching etc... but I really like it ;)

Thats my example:

I have my develop branch with let's say "1.0-SNAPSHOT" set as version in my pom.xml.

On top of that I create a feature branch and I want to be able to build that feature branch independently. As a result I (guess I) have to change the version to "1.0-<feature>-SNAPSHOT".

Everything works as expected now. Bamboo will build my feature branch, I can deploy the resulting artefacts, they are different, don't interfere, ...

But now I'm done with my feature and want to merge it.

When I create a "Pull Request" in Stash I have the pom.xml changes as well in there, although I don't want them to be there...

(of course I could just change the version back before the merge, but that's kinda weird)

=> So what is the common workflow for that?

4 answers

1 accepted

3 votes
Answer accepted

Hi Johannes,

This is one of the real problems with maven. Checking the version into a file in Git is a bad idea (we have the same problem in Stash though).

What we do is to have a special build that does a maven release on a temporary branch, merges back to the original branch and _then_ does a 'git merge --strategy=ours' to the next 'upstream' branch. This merge will completely ignore the changes on the source branch (which is normally something you don't want to do). From that point you can merge up the chain as normal as there will be nothing to merge. It's not quite the same thing as what you're doing though, we don't bother with feature versions, only releases.

So basically you can't really merge the pull request without doing something manual first. Reverting the version before (or just after) the merge might be your best option. It's ugly, but that's maven for you.




I worried about that, but good to hear that you have them same problem ;)

We would love to see Stash enhanced to support this common scenario...!


perhaps a little bit late, but if you still have this problem, have a look on my project on github. I solved that via a git merge driver. 


This is ideal for our use. Thanks, Sven.

Hi Johannes,

To avoid pom merge, you could perhaps use bamboo variables inside the pom as explained here.

If variable names are the same in feature branch and in develop branch no merge will be proposed for pom.xml



I'll give it a try ;)

This extension generate the version by the current branch. It will not change the pom.xml so.

Disclaimer: I am the author.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
Community showcase
Published in Bitbucket

New improvements to user management in Bitbucket Cloud 👥

Hey Community! We’re willing to wager that quite a few of you not only use Bitbucket, but administer it too. Our team is excited to share that we’ll be releasing improvements throughout this month of...

3,753 views 10 16
Read article

Community Events

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find an event

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.

Host an event

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events

Events near you