We have what I call a high-resolution permissions scheme in SVN using the authz file. What I mean by that is this:
we may have a team were developer X has permissions to a file but developer Y does not. If developer Y were to review code from developer X, we want our code review tool to honor or otherwise allow SVN to authenticate before allowing developer Y to see the file/changes.
Creating elborate group and/or permission schemes inside crucible is not practical; our authz has ~3K rules.
Does Crucible provide a mechanism for honoring SVN authz permissions?
As a project manager, I have discovered that different developers want to bring their previous branching method with them when they join the team. Some developers are used to performing individual wo...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs