You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
Atlassian is neglecting Bitbucket Issues and pushing Jira instead, I think that's a fact, isn't it? It's just so slow...
We are a small webdesign firm and use bitbucket & pipelines for the coding, as well as bitbucket issues for around 40 of our clients, so they can file tickets. So costs-per-user sum up quickly.
If we would migrate the BB issues to Jira, we'd add another 7$ per user to our monthly cost, right? And if we remove those "issues-only" users from bitbucket, they will lose the access to the code, which is not strictly necessary, but somehow nice for transparency.
Isn't there something like a combined pricing, say 5$ / user and you get Jira Issues & Bitbucket Standard? Probably not?
It's not that we need a much bigger feature set but just a better user experience for the issues... but still the tight integration with BB.
Any suggestions?