Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root


1 badge earned


Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!


Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.


Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!


Come for the products,
stay for the community

The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.

Atlassian Community about banner
Community Members
Community Events
Community Groups

Discontent with Bitbucket Issues: Subscribe to Bitbucket and Jira?

Atlassian is neglecting Bitbucket Issues and pushing Jira instead, I think that's a fact, isn't it? It's just so slow...

We are a small webdesign firm and use bitbucket & pipelines for the coding, as well as bitbucket issues for around 40 of our clients, so they can file tickets. So costs-per-user sum up quickly.

If we would migrate the BB issues to Jira, we'd add another 7$ per user to our monthly cost, right? And if we remove those "issues-only" users from bitbucket, they will lose the access to the code, which is not strictly necessary, but somehow nice for transparency. 

Isn't there something like a combined pricing, say 5$ / user and you get Jira Issues & Bitbucket Standard? Probably not?

It's not that we need a much bigger feature set but just a better user experience for the issues... but still the tight integration with BB.

Any suggestions?

0 answers

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events